Answer:
The needed help you need is right here: The author’s purpose for writing "Banksy and the Tradition of Destroying Art” is to inform readers how Banksy’s actions are similar to actions of other artists in history. Also, the author wants to inform readers about how, despite efforts to destroy art to show that some art should not have more value than other art, artists have actually increased the value of their art. This is because the destructive actions make collectors and the elite just compete more to acquire the desired pieces of art. Describing examples in art history and explaining the cause-effect relationship between the artists and the market supports the author’s purpose.
Explanation:
This is because The author’s purpose for writing "Banksy and the Tradition of Destroying Art” is to inform readers how Banksy’s actions are similar to actions of other artists in history. Also, the author wants to inform readers about how, despite efforts to destroy art to show that some art should not have more value than other art, artists have actually increased the value of their art. This is because the destructive actions make collectors and the elite just compete more to acquire the desired pieces of art. Describing examples in art history and explaining the cause-effect relationship between the artists and the market supports the author’s purpose.
I hope this is what you’re looking for, if not I’m sorry. If you have any questions about this please let me know.
1. The main conflict of the story is to figure out who is the “winner” of the lottery
2. There is irony used in the story
3. How the tone changes throughout the story
4. The story is American literature
5. There is more than one theme but still has its main focus
6. How the author gives out escalating clues
Answer: Brownian motion. This is the motion of small objects (like pollen) that appear to jiggle around while sitting in a drop of water. You can view this motion under a microscope.
Explanation:
