Answer:
FALSE
Explanation:
It is False that the difference between operations and projects is that operations end when their objectives have been reached, whereas projects do not.
The reverse is true because projects are time-bound and they come to an end when their objectives have been achieved, but company operations are expected to continue as a going concern.
A project is an activity to meet the creation of a unique product or service, an thereafter terminates while operations are day to day routine activities that are expected to continue
The retaliating gas station has employed a<u> grim trigger</u> strategy.
<h3>What is grim trigger strategy?</h3>
Grim trigger strategy can be defined as the way in which a two parties or two people enter into an agreement in which because one of them decide to defect from the agreement and the second person as well defect from the agreement.
Based on the scenario we can say that the retaliating gas station has employed a grim trigger strategy.
Learn more about <u>grim trigger</u> strategy here:brainly.com/question/984979
#SPJ1
Answer:
Check the explanation
Explanation:
a)
In IFRS according to IAS 19 all past service cost is recognized in the net income in the period in which amendment (change) is made by entity for defined benefit pension, it does not matter what is the status of the employees who will benefit the change. So in Year 1 $150000 will be expended completely and in subsequent years the amount is $0
Year 1 =$150000
Subsequent years= $0
b) In US GAAP the past service cost is recorded in Accumulated other comprehensive income in the year of amendment. It is amortized over the future working life of the participants.
Year 1 is year of adoption hence $0 is amortized because $150000 is included in Accumulated other comprehensive income.
Subsequent years: (150000/10=15000) $15000 will be amortized for each year for 10 years.
Answer:
Efficient frontier analysis closely resembles a graphic system that breaks down risk performance and will show three levels. The return or investment of low, medium and high risk can help in the decision-making process. EFA reminds me of one of my favorite TV shows, Shark Tank. In Shark Tank you will see "sharks" or investors who choose to invest in a company, usually new companies, and often these investments have a high risk, but they could also have a high rate of return. As with most things, there are some limitations with the use of an efficient border analysis. A common limitation for EFA is the lack of reality that the return will always follow a distribution flow. EFA is not an exact science; It is difficult to identify and disaggregate. Stocks are a good example of EFA limitation. Investment actions are difficult to predict and preserve because there is a lot of unpredictability in the stock market.
NOTE: Explanation is in the answer.
Answer:
The correct answer is "$8630".
Explanation:
Given:
Residence purchased,
= $400,000
Residence sold,
= $460,000
Alan qualifies,
=
=
= ($)
hence,
The gain will be:
=
= ($)