Answer:
In some cases (for example, that of the Talensi), an independent community or chiefdom was aware that others like it shared the same culture and social structure, and there were occasional common rituals that brought independent communities together. In other cases (for example, the Dagaba), political and cultural boundaries were not sharp, and there was no sense that an ethnic group included some communities and excluded others, although shifting distinctions were made based on various cultural traits. In the case of the Dagaba, the most important or recurrent of these distinctions seemed to be, and in the mid-twentieth century continued to be, whether inheritance was exclusively determined in the patrilineal line or, at least in part, followed the matrilineal line.
Explanation:
I hope this helps :)
I will help If you answer this one thing. Are yuou a K12 student?
Explanation:
because of it's large size,
Answer:
The correct response is the special-interest effect.
Explanation:
This kind of situation regarding the financing of projects with public subsidies is called the special-interest effect. This is a complicated notion because it denotes the tendency for politicians to favor special interest groups that are easily identifiable and that appear well-organized and competent through prior interactions for example. This is because the wider voting populace tends to ignore issues or seems more apathetic. To the individual politician, it seems more efficient and logical to give funds to those interests that are more organized and active. Special interest voters make their candidates and legislators aware of their needs and the projects they promote. In this way, politicians and legislators are led to promote the positions of special interests.