Answer:1.Leadership has been defined asD) the ability to influence a group toward the achievement of a vision or set of goals
2.Nonsanctioned leadership is as important as formal influence.
3.E) the match between the leader's style and the degree to which the situation gives the leader control
4.E) emotional stability
5.B) empathy
6.B) differences between an effective and an ineffective leader
Explanation: a leadership goal is to lead a group towards achieving a set vision of whatever project they may be working on hence it is important that a leader is able to handle their own emotions , be emotional stable because they are dealing with different types of people. They don't have to harsh they still have to show empathy towards what the team may be going through due to the amount of work they are doing. All of these theories gives us what set apart an effective to a non effective leader which makes a leader choose which path they want to take.
The Miranda warning is usually given when a person is arrested. However, the Miranda Rights attach during any “custodial interrogation”(when someone is deprived of their freedom and may not leave)
Answer and Explanation:
Kant's principle of universalizability suggests that we do what we feel should be generalised or in his words universalised. I'm there words for something to be considered morally valid it should be generally satisfactory and not just apply to one person
On the other hand his principle of humanity suggests that we do those things that treat each human being as though he is the end not the means. In other words, we do not consider another human being to be something that could be used to achieve another thing but the sole purpose or end for which anything is done
The above do have contradictory applications since by generalizing a thing we could still be using a human being and not making him the end in this respect. I believe the best of the two principles however is the humanity principle since by holding this principle dear every human being would treat each other better and the universalizability principle would still apply.
This is an example of negative reinforcement.
Her mother scolded her every time Jane bit her nails - so Jane learned that every time she bites her nails, she is going to be scolded sternly by her mother. In order to avoid that, she stopped biting her nails, and thus the reinforcement was successful.
