Answer:
Spearman believed that people who are intelligent in maths are usually not intelligent in verbal skills
While Thurstone believed that people who are intelligent in one Areas are usually intelligent in all areas.
Explanation:
My believe aligns with Spearman in that people who are intelligent with mathematics are usually not intelligent with verbal skills, mathematical skill involved being analytical , manipulative and while verbal skill deals with how you approach words, comprehend meanings. So one might be very analytical with very good approach to problem solving but might not be really good at putting words together and making substantial meaning out of it.
Answer:
15 points higher
Explanation:
The <u><em>Flynn Effect</em></u> is a phenomenon that the increase in IQ over the ages is an increase in <u><em>overall abstract problem solving</em></u> rather than actual intelligence, and are attributed to the environment in which younger generations are surrounded by compared to older generations. According to this effect an average 18-year old scored 15 points higher than that of someone 60 years ago.
**I had this question and studied the Flynn Effect in high school**
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
<span>In order to understand the differences between these types of benefits, we should start by looking at the names of the types of benefits. The first type of benefit is legally required benefits. As their name implies, these are benefits that employers are required (by law) to provide for their employees. For example, all employers must provide contributions to their employees’ Social Security funds. They also have to provide workers’ compensation premiums for their workers.</span>
As someone working on deliberative democracy and its practices, I think we should not exaggerate electoral accountability. Of course it is better than nothing however it is not an effective way of ensuring a democratic system. At the end of the day, we are talking about a power that can be used every 4 or 5 years. Such power is simply not powerful. The lack of citizen power in politics is a systemic issue. Unless the ideas and perspectives of citizens are transmitted to the political arena, we cannot talk about the power of people.
Education is crucially important. With better education people's voting preferences might have better bases. However, this does not make the system any more democratic than it is now unless people have more chances of effecting the policy making. This needs a better systemic environment than electoral politics. Here, I think deliberative and participatory models offer great ways of political decision-making.
<h3>hope it's help you </h3><h3>plz mark as brain list ........!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</h3>
Answer:d
Explanation:Space is infinite and that’s the biggest one so
