performance appraisal consists of assessing an employee's performance and providing him or her with appropriate feedback.
<h3>What is performance appraisal?</h3>
Performance appraisal is done to check the performance of a particular employee.
It is done from time to time through the review of workdone and contribution of such individual to the organizations.
Therefore, performance appraisal is consists of assessing an employee's performance and providing him or her with appropriate feedback.
learn more on performance appraisal here,
brainly.com/question/24673911
True, Differentiation on the basis of innovation and technological competency depends on the research and development function.
Technology is the result of accumulated knowledge and the application of skills, methods, and processes used in industrial production and scientific research. Technology is embedded in the operation of all mechanical and electronic devices, with or without detailed knowledge of their function, for the intended purpose of an organization.
The technology of society consists of so-called systems. A system works by taking input, modifying that input through what is called a process, and producing a result that achieves the intended purpose of the system.
The earliest and simplest form of technology is the development of knowledge leading to the application of basic tools. The prehistoric invention of carved stone tools and the discovery of ways to control fire has increased the food sources available to humans.
Learn more about Technology here: brainly.com/question/25110079
#SPJ4
The common arguments that are in favor of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) are:
Public image of the company.
Moral Justification.
Public Support for business.
Long run survival of the organization and the public both.
Common arguments that go against CSR are:
Ambiguity in business policies.
Moral Responsibility.
Shareholders' rights
Explanation:
Against
The public should perceive the company as their savior and not their enemy. CSR helps a company stay in the good books of the public. If a cigarette manufacturing company opens a profit free farm or a recreational park for the public, it will ensure the maintenance of a positive image.
Morally, when a company takes something from the public e.g their clean air, or clean environment, then morally the company is bound to give something in return e.g a water filtration plant.
CSR can lead the public to support the company during times of need. A company during tough times might get several volunteers if it is known to have given much to the public.
Co-dependence is essential for the survival of both the organization and the public. Companies excel if the public likes them. If a company has been known to have only take and never give, then the balance is disturbed.
Against:
Not every company has the resources or interest to focus on one problem. Therefore, ambiguous policies of different organizations lead to partial working on one social issue or environmental issue. it leads the problem to be partially solved and not completely eliminated.
Company might morally owe the public in some domain but might not have the resources to fix that particular problem. It may leave the company in a moral debt. In order to compensate, a company may go beyond its capabilities which will not result in mutual benefit. Only one party will be happy.
CSR activities require resources. A company has several stakeholders and all might nit agree to spending/donating their profits for CSR activities. This may sound 'selfish' but public doesn't always know what the stakeholders are going through. CSR in such a case may deprive a stakeholder from a fraction of his share of profit.
Answer:
See attached accounting entries.
Explanation:
For question 1, the likelihood of a payment occurring is probable, the is chance that Pacific Cruise Lines will pay liability as such estimated amount of $1.29 million should be set aside.
For question 2, the likelihood of a payment occurring is probable, the is chance that Pacific Cruise Lines will pay liability as such estimated maximum amount of $1.29 million should be set aside.
For question 3, the likelihood of a payment occurring is reasonably probable, the is chance that Pacific Cruise Lines will pay liability as such estimated amount of $1.29 million should be set aside.
For question 3, the likelihood of a payment occurring is remote, that is, there little relationship with this case that cause Pacific Cruise Lines being liable to pay as such potential amount of $1.29 million should be set aside.
Directing a company to assist law enforcement agents in enabling a search is known as an order to demonstrate probable cause that a search or seizure is justified.
In order to obtain a search warrant or warrant, law enforcement officers must show cause for which they believe a search or seizure is justified. A judicial authority (usually a judge) will consider all the circumstances and decide whether to issue a warrant.
A search is a search of some or all of an individual's property for specific items related to a crime by law enforcement officers who have reason to believe that a crime has been committed.
Learn more about law enforcement at
brainly.com/question/24324910
#SPJ4
