<span>Such experiences demonstrate the cocktail party effect. <span>This
phenomenon occurs when in a place with many voices, as in a party, we
can concentrate on a single conversation, but also when listening to a
keyword from another place in the room, like our name, we can focus on
this new stimulus.
I hope my answer can help you.
</span></span>
I believe cannons is the correct answer
Question Options:
a. modified multiple choice
b. Likert scale
c. Cronbach scale
d. item ranking scale
Answer: LIKERT SCALE.
Explanation: Likert scale is a psychometric scale used in questionnaires that allows respondents to specify their level of agreement or disagreement on a symmetric scale. Likert scale is typically a five, seven, or nine-point agreement scale used to measure respondents' agreement with a variety of statements.
Religious toleration Meaning-<span> is people allowing other people to think or practice other</span>religions<span> and beliefs
Hopes this helps :D</span>
Answer: The situation is unconstitutional because it is defamation or libel
Explanation: The freedom of the press is guaranteed by the First Amendment of the American Constitution, which regulates all the rights and obligations of the media, including the press. This means that everyone has the right to freely report and write, and freely express their opinions without censorship. However, there are some limitations when it comes to press freedom. There are, among other things, the extent to which the journalist, i.e the writer of the article, can secure the protection of a confidential source, then also indecency. In this our case it is defamation which, when it comes to defamation in the press, calls libel. If Nancy wanted to make up a story about a politician she personally dislikes, then it is defamation. The First Amendment also does not guarantee the journalist the right to interfere personal feelings about the politician with professional writing in the newspaper. This means that if Nancy made up the story of a politician without real evidence of any wrongdoing, then it was defamation in the newspaper, therefore, libel.
