The fighting continued in America. Americans still didn’t have independence yet and they were willing to fight for it. Hope this helps! Have a great day :)
In the past, several cases of abuse and foreclosure of law had taken place. Convictions unfair or without the right to ample defense. Disproportionate penalties. Condemnations by political poets, etc.
Due process is one of the democratic achievements guaranteed by the Constitution. In a democracy, all citizens accused of a crime have the right to a lawyer, ample defense and an exempt judgment, being able to resort to other instances to curb any kind of excess. The Law also applies to all citizens, regardless of color, gender or social class. Ordinarily, everyone must respect the laws in the same way.
This question is missing the options. I've found the complete question online. It is as follows:
Alanis is sitting down after school to examine the research project she has been assigned in her high-school history class. She must first research the reasons behind the Great Depression in American history. Then, she must develop assertions concerning the best way to nurture a nation's economy. Which type of thinking has her teacher asked her to engage in?
A. Inductive reasoning
B. Deductive reasoning
C. Utilizing representativeness heuristics
D. Utilizing availability heuristics
Answer:
The type of thinking she was asked to engage in is:
A. Inductive reasoning
.
Explanation:
<u>When we engage in inductive reasoning, we use premises to reach a conclusion. In other words, we use data that we know to be true or false to draw possible conclusions from.</u> In inductive reasoning, there is room for error. That is, even if all the premises are true, the conclusion we reach can very well be false. In the case explained in the passage, Alanis has been asked to research the reasons behind the Great Depression. The reasons will be her premises. From them, she must draw a conclusion - how to nurture a nation's economy. However, even with the right and true premises, Alanis can still come up with ideas that wouldn't really work to nurture the economy. That is an example of inductive reasoning.
The correct answer would be, Do employers like this one actually give people equal consideration, or do they just say they do?
A teenager notices that his new employer likes to boast that no matter the background and identity of new applicants, she always gives people equal consideration when it comes to hiring. The above mentioned question can be asked or thought by the teenager on the basis of his observation.
Explanation:
A teenager is someone between the age of 13 to 19. During this age, the teenagers are usually exploring the world with open eyes. When they enter the practical world, they start to judge the people and situations.
So when a teenager sees that his boss likes to boast, likes to talk with pride about the achievements and possessions, no matter the background and identity of new applicants, the employer always gives people equal consideration when it comes to hiring, then the first sociological question that can come in his mind would be that does his employer really and actually give people equal consideration or she just says like that.
Learn more about Sociology at:
brainly.com/question/10905177
#LearnWithBrainly
