Answer:
Explanation:
This is an algebra question about fractions.
You need to find 3/10 of the income, and the income is $44,000.
You must muliply the fraction 3/10 by the $44,000 income.
To multily one fraction by a whole number you convert the whole number to a fraction with denominator 1. Then multiply numerator with numerator and denominator with denominator. This is how:
Answer: See explanation
Explanation:
The null hypotheses for the above scenario will be the statement of no effect and it'll be the mean weight of the bag that filled will be 420 grams.
H0: μ = 420
The alternative hypotheses for the above scenario will be that the bag isn't filled with 420 grams. They are either underfilled below 420 grams or overfilled above 420 grams.
Ha: μ ≠ 420
Answer:
d. The company will take on too many high-risk projects and reject too many low-risk projects.
Explanation:
Weighted Average Cost of capital is the firm's is the rate which a firm has to pay to the lenders of fund. There can be different WACC for different projects as the WACC is based on the business risk. The beta factor can be different for all projects and since it is dependent on the nature of project and the risk it involves.
Answer:
The demand curve will intersect the long-run average cost (LRAC) at its downward sloping point.
Explanation:
Usually utility companies are monopolies because the cost of setting up the service is very high, but once the initial investment is finished, the average cost of providing the service is extremely low. This applies to all utilities: electricity, water, natural gas, etc. The marginal cost of adding new customers is also extremely low.
Most utilities are public companies because consumers demand the service but are not willing to pay a high price for it.
Answer:
Eliot
Explanation:
From the illustration, Eliot has confirmed the receipt of the check. The implication is that John has transferred the risk of holding and/or safeguarding the check to Eliot. Hence, Eliot has the duty and care to ensure the proper handling of the check. That the check got lost while in her care further confirms the risk is on her. And the non written of Perry's name on the lost check doesn't take away the risk from Eliot. This viewpoint is also in line with the provisions of the UCC.