<h2>
Answer:</h2>
Definitely we can't prove that triangle DFG is congruent to MNP. The reason is because the angles that are congruent don't match the corresponding vertex, that is, the corresponding vertices of these triangles are as follows:
D is corresponding to M
F is corresponding to N
G is corresponding to P
But the angle we know in the first triangle lies on vertex D while on the second triangle the angle lies on vertex P but it should lies on vertex M, so we'd prove they are congruent by Side-Angle-Side Postulate (SAS).
Answer:
2cm
Step-by-step explanation:
The volume of water displaced by the rod is
v = πr^2 h = π * 3^2 * 8 = 72π cm^3
The drop in water level is the rod volume divided by the cross-section area of the tin, or
72π/(π*6^2) = 2 cm
Answer:
25 ft
Step-by-step explanation:
The tree's shadow is 4 times the length of the man's shadow, so we presume the tree is 4 times the height of the man: 4 × (6 ft 3 in) = (24 ft 12 in) = 25 ft.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
6