Answer:
Insurable interest
Explanation:
The insurance interest is the interest of the insurer while taking the policy so that the risk of the loss is reduced also it is an important requirement that makes the firm or the event to be legal, valid, enforceable, and protected against any harmful acts done intentionally
Therefore according to the given situation, the concept in which enough interest must exist on the part of the insurer while taking the policy is known as the insurer interest
Hence, the first option is correct
A settlement made with the aid of using a minor is frequently voidable, however a minor can most effective keep away from a settlement all through his or her minority popularity and for an inexpensive time after he reaches the age of majority. After an inexpensive length of time, the settlement is deemed to be ratified and cannot be avoided.
- Facts of the case: Sean, 17, a snowboarder, signs a long-term endorsement agreement for sportswear. At age 19, he wants to void the agreement by claiming that he lacked capacity when he signed the deal at 17.
- Rule of Law: Minor's Contracts are voidable at the option of Minor.
- Analysis: Since, Minor's Contract is voidable at the option of the Minor who Signs the Contact can either honor the contract or void the contract. A minor can void a contract for lack of capacity, only when he is still under the age of majority. If a minor turn 18 i.e., After attaining Majority and hasn't done anything to void the contract, then the contract can no longer be voided.
- Here, Sean has not done anything to void the contract on attaining the age of 18. So, he at the age of 19, cannot void the agreement by claiming that he lacked capacity when he signed the agreement at 17.
- Decision: Sean Vs. Sportswear Company: In the light of the above provisions, a Court will not permit Sean to now void the agreement.
Learn more about minority popularity here:
brainly.com/question/14457086
#SPJ4
Answer: AGREE
Explanation:
A Monopoly faces no competition and are the only sellers of the product they sell. If firms in an industry successfully engage in collusion, the resultant effect will definitely be not unlike a Monopoly because they will set prices as a single firm, control output as a single firm and essentially run the market as a single firm.
They will sell at a rate where the Marginal Revenue curve will be below the demand curve. This will mean a higher price than a competitive market which was probably the main incentive for collusion.
A recent example would be the collusion between BMW, Daimler and Volkswagen, to hinder technological progress in improving the quality of vehicle emissions in order to reduce the cost of production and maximize profits. Thankfully this was busted by the European Commission in 2019.
In a case whereby john’s friend, Michael, just got fired from his job as a server at a local restaurant and narrated the issue to John, and John says "so, your boss took the customer’s words over yours, then John means that his boss do not trust him.
<h3>What is the trust between the employee and employer?</h3>
The trust between the employee and employer can be seen as one that do make the relationship between the employer as well as the employee to be strong.
It should be noted that the Trust in the workplace implies that there is a culture of honesty as well as psychological safety which exist between the employee as well as the employer, hence in the case whereby the employer is acting against the employee as a result of the comments from the customer without any investigation implies that there is no trust between them which is not adviceable.
Learn more about customer at:
brainly.com/question/1286522
#SPJ1
