Answer:
A
Explanation:
To answer the question, we look at an extreme scenario of 0% interest rate and see the minimum repayment Jade will make on the loan taken
Therefore,
Interest Rate = 0%
This means that the loan to be paid will be calculated as follows
Monthly payments x 12 Months x 14 Years
= $195 x 12 months x 14 years = $32, 760
The meaning of this outcome is that the lower the interest rate to be paid, the higher the size of the loan, because at 2.9% the loan= $26,898.98 and at 0% rate the loan= $32, 760.
The conclusion therefore is a 2.7% interest rate which is lower than 2.9% but not as low as the extreme 0% will cause the loan amount to be higher than $26,898.98. This affirms option A.
Options B and C are wrong because 2.5% and 2.3% are lower than 2.9%, therefore, the loan amount will be higher. Option D is also wrong because a 3.1% interest rate is higher than 2.9%, therefore, the amount should be lower not higher than $26,898.98
Answer:
Explained below.
Explanation:
In option (a) no it does not contribute to the US GDP in any year. The transaction appears in expenditure as an increase in consumption and a decrease in net exports that offset. According to option (b) yes it contributes to US GDP in 2013. The transaction appears as an increase in investment (increase in inventory). In 2014, the transaction appears as an increase in net exports offset by a decrease in investment. According to option (c), the transaction appears in expenditure as an increase in consumption in 2014 offset by a decrease in net exports. Option (d) represents the transaction appears as an increase in investment (increase in inventory). In 2014, the transaction appears as an increase in consumption offset by a decrease in investment. According to option (e) yes, it contributes $1000 to US GDP in 2014. The $6000 purchase price exceeds the price paid by the used car dealer. The difference represents value added by the dealership - this is a service that should be counted as part of GDP.
Answer:
$1,83,000
Explanation:
Sales = 4,535,000
Cost of goods sold = $2,560,000
Operating expenses = $1,382,000
Average total assets = $4,110,000
Net Income = Sales - Cost of goods sold - Operating expenses
= $4,535,000 - $2,560,000 - $1,382,000
= $5,93,000
Target income = 10% of Average total assets
= 0.10 × $4,110,000
= $410,000
Thus,
Residual income = Net income - Target income
= $5,93,000 - $410,000
= $1,83,000
Answer:
people care more about their own surplus than they do about total surplus.
Explanation:
Price control can either be a price ceiling or a price floor.
A price ceiling is when the government or an agency of the government sets the maximum price for a good or service. It is usually set below equilibrium price.
Price ceiling increase consumer surplus and reduce producer surplus.
A price floor is when the government or an agency of the government sets the least price a good or service can be sold. It is usually set above equilibrium price.
Price floor increases producer surplus and reduces consumer surplus.
Producers would be advocating for a price floor because it increases their surplus, while, consumers would advocate for a price ceiling.
Consumer surplus is the difference between the willingness to pay of a consumer and the price of the product.
Producer surplus is the difference between the price of a product and the least price the seller is willing to sell the product.
I hope my answer helps you
Answer:
Answer is $10,500.
Refer below.
Explanation:
Camille's Café is considering a project that will not produce any sales but will decrease cash expenses by $12,000. If the project is implemented, taxes will increase from $23,000 to $24,500 and depreciation will increase from $4,000 to $5,500. The amount of the operating cash flow using the top-down approach is:
$10,500
