1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
SSSSS [86.1K]
3 years ago
8

Second battle of the Somme what is the religion?

History
1 answer:
S_A_V [24]3 years ago
3 0

I got a lil confused by your statement but I’m just gonna wing it kk.

Fought solely between attacking Germans from Protestant regions and Catholic states and defending Catholic Frenchmen, this battle of attrition between two Christian powers resulted in over 700,000 casualties.

Hope I could help you

You might be interested in
What were the cause of the Cold War? What were the consequences? In what arenas were these differences In ideologies play out? W
ValentinkaMS [17]

Answer:

During World War II, the United States and the Soviet Union fought together as allies against the Axis powers. However, the relationship between the two nations was a tense one. Americans had long been wary of Soviet communism and concerned about Russian leader Joseph Stalin’s tyrannical rule of his own country. For their part, the Soviets resented the Americans’ decades-long refusal to treat the USSR as a legitimate part of the international community as well as their delayed entry into World War II, which resulted in the deaths of tens of millions of Russians. After the war ended, these grievances ripened into an overwhelming sense of mutual distrust and enmity.  

Postwar Soviet expansionism in Eastern Europe fueled many Americans’ fears of a Russian plan to control the world. Meanwhile, the USSR came to resent what they perceived as American officials’ bellicose rhetoric, arms buildup and interventionist approach to international relations. In such a hostile atmosphere, no single party was entirely to blame for the Cold War; in fact, some historians believe it was inevitable.

The Cold War: Containment

By the time World War II ended, most American officials agreed that the best defense against the Soviet threat was a strategy called “containment.” In his famous “Long Telegram,” the diplomat George Kennan (1904-2005) explained the policy: The Soviet Union, he wrote, was “a political force committed fanatically to the belief that with the U.S. there can be no permanent modus vivendi [agreement between parties that disagree].” As a result, America’s only choice was the “long-term, patient but firm and vigilant containment of Russian expansive tendencies.” “It must be the policy of the United States,” he declared before Congress in 1947, “to support free peoples who are resisting attempted subjugation…by outside pressures.” This way of thinking would shape American foreign policy for the next four decades.

Explanation:

hope this helped

5 0
2 years ago
Why did people resent the Office of Price Administration during the war?
Levart [38]
<span>The biggest problem with the OPA during WWII was controlling prices. Prices were soaring and keeping them down was the biggest problem they faced.</span>
6 0
3 years ago
How did the Middle East get it’s name
murzikaleks [220]
The origin of the term "Middle East" is considered to be in the British India Office during the 1850s. It was popularized by Alfred Thayer Mahan, an American naval strategist who was referring to the region between Arabia and India in 1902. Mahan's definition of the Middle East was the area around the Persian Gulf.
8 0
3 years ago
How does Novikov describe the United States?
MrRa [10]
In his long telegram, Novikovhas describe sees the US as a country planning for world domination. During that time, the US had been leading in manufacturing as well as had been able to create trade agreements with other countries who are hoping to prosper by rebuilding some of its structures with the help of the United States. He feels that the US had the upper hand compared to Russia, and thus started the Cold War
4 0
3 years ago
How did historian Arthur Schlesinger, Jr., describe the powers that President Johnson assumed as he escalated the war in Vietnam
ladessa [460]
Historian Arthur Schlesinger, Jr., described the powers that President Johnson assumed as he escalated the war in Vietnam as an imperial presidency. Lyndon <span>Baines </span>Johnson often referred to as LBJ, was an American politician who served as the 36thPresident of the United States from 1963 to 1969.
3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which statement describes a result of the Spanish American war.
    15·2 answers
  • List three documents of democracy that the Framers of the Constitution borrowed from
    7·2 answers
  • What group did palmer believe posed the greatest threat to the United States?
    15·2 answers
  • Should Notre Dame display the Christopher Columbus paintings? HelapPPPpPPPPp I WILL VOTE U BRAINLIEST!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ​
    11·1 answer
  • How did Elizabeth Eckford unwittingly show the rest of the world what was really going on in Little Rock?
    15·1 answer
  • What ultimately led to burnside losing the battle of fredericksburg
    15·2 answers
  • Where in the constitution does it give the national government the upper hand?
    10·1 answer
  • Why were all of these "programs”<br> enacted by Roosevelt important?
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following describes an outcome of the U.S. military involvement
    5·2 answers
  • Ramadan is a special time of year in which religion?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!