<span>A typical married couple would probably be a. Gilbert would be for splitting the household chores on the basis of time spent on each task. However, it is a bit unusual to actually calculate the time it takes for each task. B. and c. doesn't make sense. D. is also valid, however.</span>
Answer:
The right answer is A. Liabilities increased by $1.0 million in 2018
Explanation:
During 2017 and 2018, we have the following information:
+ In 2017, there is $2 million wages earned but not yet paid, so, Wages payable at the end of 2017 should be amounted to $2 million.
+ In 2018, there is another $8 million wages earned. At the same period, there is $7 million wages paid which is distributed as followed: $2 million to clear all Wages payable in 2017 and the other $5 million to clear $5 million out of $8 million wages payable in 2018. So, the only wages liability outstanding at the end of 2018 is the amount of $3 million earned in 2018 but not yet paid ($8 million - $5 million).
=> Liabilities in 2018 increases $1.0 million in comparison with the year 2017 ( $3 million - $2 million).
The correct option is B
<u>Explanation:</u>
In an economy, planned investment spending is always equal to planned saving. If actual saving falls short of (exceeds) planned saving, then actual investment falls short of (exceeds) planned investment.
That is the other part of the saving paradox. If an economy produces too much, such that saving is greater than planned investment, inventory will build up, giving signal to producers to reduce output, to restore equilibrium. Such investment scheme is suitable only to communist countries. Keynes has another investment theory in his liquidity story. But investment theories are equally a posterior.
Therefore, Option B is correct
Answer : rent to own business !
shes paying for her to own it but still gets to take it home
Answer:
C. the greater the value of the multiplier
Explanation:
As we know that
The formula to compute the Government spending multiplier is shown below:
Government spending multiplier = 1 ÷ (1 - marginal propensity to consume)
where,
Marginal propensity to consume refers to the change in consumption with regard to the change in income
So if the value of the marginal propensity to consume is higher than there would also increase in the value of the multiplier and in the same proportion it would be greater
