I believe the correct answer is Hierarchical Authority
Wеbеr's thеοriеs, dеvеlοpеd at thе turn οf thе 20th cеntury, hеlpеd dеfinе thе еcοnοmic and pοlitical systеms еmеrging frοm thе highly cοncеntratеd authοrity οf hеrеditary rulеrs and thеir suppοrtеrs. Thеy dеfinеd many 20th-cеntury institutiοns. Pοwеr in burеaucraciеs is vеstеd in pοsitiοn, nοt pеrsοn, and authοrity travеls thrοugh thе lеvеls οf thе hiеrarchy basеd οn agrееd-upοn functiοns.
From the viewpoint of an outsider, an non-owner and an consultant which is a replacement analysis is most objectively conducted. When you are conducting a replacement analysis the most objectively conducted is from the view point of the three which is from an outsider, an consultant and an non-owner.
Answer:
The payback period for Silva Inc. is 3 years. If considering only this method of evaluating projects, Silva Inc will invest in project A and dismiss project B.
Payback period A=2,1539 years.
Payback period B= 3,0042 years
Explanation:
The payback period refers to the amount of time it takes to recover the cost of an investment. The payback period is the length of time an investment reaches a breakeven point.
<u>Cash Flow A:</u>
$
I0= - 70.000
1= 28000 = -42000
2= 38000 = -4000
3= 26000 = 22000
Payback period= full years until recovery +
unrecovered cost beginning year/Cashflow during year
Payback period A= 2 + (4000/26000)= 2,1539 years.
<u>Cash Flow B:</u>
$
I0= -80000
1= 20000 = -60000
2= 23000 = -37000
3= 36000 = -1000
4= 240000 = 239000
Payback period B= 3 + 1000/240000= 3,0042 years
<u>The payback period for Silva Inc. is 3 years. If considering only this method of evaluating projects, Silva Inc will invest in project A and dismiss project B. </u>
<u></u>
It would be called scarcity.
Answer:
A) Proactiveness.
Explanation:
This explained to be a conceptual development in entrepreneurial orientation that enacts a degree of anticipation in product and also increase a productivity in the entrepreneurial sphere. Some undiluted descriptions shows it to be the introduction of results based on its qualitative study, which is been aimed at the characterizing of the proactiveness in entrepreneurial software firms. Experienced researched organizations has shown that the one which are related to environment monitoring and opportunities quest been highlighted are also core part of proactiveness.
