Answer:
The correct answer is D.
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Sales=$775000
Variable expenses= 523000
Contribution margin= 252000
Fixed expenses= 132000
Net income= $120000
Hard Rubber:
Sales=$65000
Variable expenses=58000
Contribution margin= 7000
Fixed expenses= 22000
Net income= -15000
New net income= 120,000 + 15,000 - 22,000= 113,000
Answer:
b. rise, so demand in the market for foreign-currency exchange shifts right.
Explanation:
- An increase in the interest rates leads to a rise in the capital outflow as savings and investment lead to more net capital outflow.
- This is the movement of the assets on the company and is considered to be bad for the economy and leads to undesirable changes in the supply of the foreign currency as a shift in the demands of the consumers. This may result in political and economic instability.
Answer: Having lower opportunity costs.
Explanation: Opportunity cost can be defined as the cost of next best alternative foregone. In this case, James is saving his money by taking work of a professional from a new recruit also he gets the opportunity to procure high quality materials which he was earlier not able to. Thus, he is saving a major portion of income because of a less costly alternative available.
Answer:
<u>c. there is the possibility that the funds are used for riskier behavior than the lender agreed to.</u>
Explanation:
True. The term "Moral Hazard" as used in an investment context, often refers to a scenario where one party with a <em>lesser risk burden</em> in a business agreement, <u>deliberately </u>takes investment risk that would be detrimental to others in the agreement who have a higher risk burden.
It is an unethical business practice; a moral hazard, and so acts as a barrier to investors who may want to finance global growth.
Solution:
Let's start by assuming that the taxi ride demand is extremely elastic, to the extent that it is vertically sluggish! If the cabbies raise the fair price by 10% from 10.00 per mile to 11.00 per kilometre, the number of riders remains 20.
Total income before fair growth= 20* 10= 200.
Total income following fair growth = 11* 20= 220.
A 10% increase in the fare therefore leads to a 10% increase in the driver's revenue.
Therefore, the assumption in this situation is that the cab drivers think the taxi driving requirement is highly inelastic.
The demand curve facing the drivers of the cab is still inelastic, but not vertically bent.
When the rate increased from 10% to 11, riders declined from 20% to 19%
Total revenue before fair growth is 20* 10= 200
The gap between revenue and fair growth is 19* 11= 209
This means that a realistic 10% raise doesn't result in a 10% boost on income Because the market curve for taxi rides is not 100% inelastic, but rather low inelastic, so that a fair increase (control) allows consumers to lose their incomes.
