The answer is ‘fashions changed, and the use of furs in fashion ended’
Answer:
<u><em>A universal law</em></u>.
Kant says that when trying to decide whether an action is morally permissible, we must ask if we can consistently will that the maxim of our action should become <u><em>a universal law.</em></u>
Explanation:
The moral concept in Kant drives from the idea of the universal law. According to him, humans must consider if their actions are good or bad if implies and are toward the world. If it is good for the world, it is morally acceptable. On the contrary, just forget. It's pretty simple on the surface, but when we analyze deeply we can see that moral is a complicated concept that is not easy to measure.
Show them the affects of what would happen if they didn’t take responsibility, eg struggles of obesity etc, hope this helps :)
Answer:
There are differing responses to this question, depending on which character provides the answer. Casca explains to Brutus and Cassius that, in the arena, Caesar refused the crown every time Antony offered it because each time he refused, the crowd responded uproariously. Casca observes that “he would fain have had it,” implying that Caesar’s refusal was, essentially, theater and that he was simply pandering to the crowd. On the other hand, Antony uses the same incident to reveal that Caesar refused the crown because he was not ambitious or power-hungry. However, it’s more likely that Caesar’s motivations were as Casca implies: Caesar theatrically refused the crown to further secure the hearts and minds of the people, and he fully intended to accept the crown when the senate officially offered it to him.
Explanation:
