<u>Answer:
</u>
The study carried out by Dr. Xu is a randomized controlled study.
<u>Explanation:</u>
- For the sake of determination of how the results of the students change by doing certain changes to the examination pattern, Dr. Xu devised that the change is considerably evident.
- Dr. Xu provided and intervention in the process of exam in the form of guides which helped the students to score better later. Hence, from the standard of conduct of the study, it can be said to be a randomized controlled study.
This is an example of "Belief persistence".
The standard of belief persistence, expresses that 'While changing beliefs because of new proof, you should keep on believing however many of the old convictions as could be expected under the circumstances. Specifically, this implies if an individual gets new data, she needs to oblige it in her new belief set, and, if the new data isn't conflicting with the old belief set, at that point;(1) the individual needs to keep up every one of the beliefs she already had and (2) the change ought to be negligible as in each suggestion in the new belief set must be deducible from the association of the old belief set and the new data.
<u>Answer:
</u>
We can apply some of the similar trends in classical civilizations to the historical experience of people of Teotihuacan to a limited extent as the similarity among the two was found in only the disciplines of politics and trade and commerce.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- The administration in the ancient Teotihuacan society was sound and solid as the politics in the region was based on the idea of development.
- The methodology of trade and commerce used by the Teotihuacan people and some nuances of their trade matched with that of classical civilizations.
<span>a. few govt regulations of business</span>
Answer: (E) It is an attempt to undermine the criticism cited against the claim that capital punishment for theft was an essential part of the labor discipline of British capitalism.
Explanation:
The point that there is a difference between capitalism and industrialization was made to counter the criticism of capital punishment being an essential part of British capitalism and this is shown when the text reads "... such a criticism overlooks..." which means that the point was made in direct opposition to the criticism.
The author here therefore supports the argument that capital punishment for theft was in fact essential in instilling labor discipline.