Answer:
The correct answer is:
d. Active euthanasia.
Explanation:
In other words, active euthanasia would be considered murder, since this act refers to the fact that the medical team or any other person performs any action in order to intentionally end the patient's life. In this case, it is worth clarifying that one acts against the wishes of the patient or without his consent, and it is considered an illegal act in all countries.
Answer: B) To prohibit charging excess interest on loans.
Without these laws in place, price gouging (more or less) is very possible. Though with things like high interest rate on credit cards, it's a bit vague and unclear just what constitutes "unreasonable" in terms of how high the rate gets. It seems subjective in my opinion.
Answer:
ISSUE Whether flag burning constitutes "symbolic speech" protected by the First Amendment. RULING Yes. REASONING (5-4) The majority of the Court, according to Justice William Brennan, agreed with Johnson and held that flag burning constitutes a form of "symbolic speech" that is protected by the First Amendment.
Explanation:
Texas v. Johnson, 491 U.S. 397 (1989), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States that invalidated prohibitions on desecrating the American flag enforced in 48 of the 50 states.
Heat moves through radiation, convection, and conduction.
Answer: The correct answer is : E) Instrumental
Explanation: Instrumental aggression is aggression in which the ultimate purpose is not to injure or cause harm. The objective, the goal or the desired recourse can be to obtain money, social approval, defense, status, domain. Instrumental aggression is also known as proactive aggression.
