Answer:
What do you think would benefit you and everyone else? What could the effects be? This question is asking for your opinion.
When it comes to executive agreements, they do not have the same force as a formal treaty so this is FALSE.
<h3>Are executive treaties as binding as formal treaties?</h3>
The U.S. Constitution requires that for a treaty to be binding on the U.S. it needs to be ratified by a super majority in the Senate.
Executive agreements do not go through this process and are only done by the President which means that they do not have the same standing a formal treaties.
Find out more on executive treaties at brainly.com/question/13733593.
#SPJ1
Answer:
The correct answer is National Security Council Paper (NSC-68).
Explanation:
National Security Council Paper (NSC-68) is a report written by the Department of State’s Policy Planning Staff (1950) passed to U.S. president Harry S. Truman (1884-1972). Its authors concluded that by introducing more weapons -including nuclear weapons, to the Soviet arsenal, the Soviet threat would soon be greatly increased. They concluded that the best course of action was to respond with a major U.S. military and weapons build-up in kind.
Hello,
Your answer would be:
C) distorted direction
Plz mark me brainliest!
Hope this helps!
I think the answer is b,c,d
