The statement about the relationship between interest rates and bond prices that is true is A. There is an inverse relationship between bond prices and interest rates, and the price of long-term bonds fluctuates more than the price of short-term bonds for a given change in interest rates (assuming that the coupon rate is the same for both).
It should be noted that when there's an increase in the interest rate, the price of bonds will be low. also, a decrease in the interest rate will lead to a higher bond price.
At a particular interest rate, the price of<em> long-term bonds</em> fluctuates more than the price of short-term bonds. It should be noted that the relationship between the bond price and<em> Interest rate</em> isn't direct but rather inversely related.
In conclusion, the correct option is A.
Read related link on:
brainly.com/question/24926932
The appropriate response is economies of scale. It alludes to the cost advantage that emerges with an expanded yield of an item. Economies of scale can emerge in a few territories inside a huge endeavor. While the advantages of this idea in ranges, for example, generation and obtaining are self-evident, economies of scale can likewise affect zones like fund.
Answer:
A significant difference between a trial and an administrative hearing is thtat a hearsay con be introduced as evidence, in an administrative hearing.
Answer:
False
Explanation:
In a competitive market, if production (and consumption) continues until the marginal benefit of one more unit equals marginal cost, then total surplus is maximized.
As for any extra unit produced
Marginal Benefit > Marginal cost = Surplus
Marginal Benefit = Marginal cost = No Surplus / No loss
Marginal Benefit > Marginal cost = loss
When your Marginal benefit is maximum and Marginal cost is minimum then the surplus will be maximized.
Most efficient situation in which benefit is maximum and the cost is minimum results in maximized surplus.
Agriculture,Food, and Natural Resources because it was a natural oil she made.
