If a firm can raise the market price by reducing its output, then It faces a downward-sloping demand curve.
If a superbly aggressive company increases its rate above the prevailing market fee, it'll lose its entire marketplace proportion, and income will lessen to 0.
Monopolists aren't allocatively efficient, due to the fact they do not produce at the amount wherein P = MC. As a result, monopolists produce less, at a higher average cost, and rate a higher price than could a combination of firms in a superbly competitive enterprise.
The monopolist will choose the income-maximizing degree of output in which MR = MC, and then fee the fee for that quantity of output as decided by using the marketplace call for curve. If that rate is above average fee, the monopolist earns high-quality earnings.
Learn more about the demand curve here: brainly.com/question/9387886
#SPJ4
Answer:
<em>Participative leadership</em>
Explanation:
Participatory leadership is an organizational aesthetic that encourages employee input into all or most business decisions.
Employees are given relevant information about company issues, as well as the course of action the company will take is determined by a majority vote.
Answer:
shakeout stage
Explanation:
Shakeout generally refers to market restructuring. Many companies are simply excluded as they can not expand alongside the market or continue to generate adverse cash flows.
Many firms have integrated with rivals or are purchased at the growth stage by those who have been able to get bigger market shares. As of the shake-out level, revenue growth, cash flows, and income begin to decline as business reaches maturity.
Answer:
$450
Explanation:
Data given in the question
Number of the units produced is 50 units
Marginal revenue is $6
Now the output increase by 50%
So, the total revenue is
= Number of units produced × marginal revenue + increased output percentage × (Number of units produced × marginal revenue)
= 50 units × $6 + 50% of $300
= $300 + $150
= $450
We simply compute by applying the above information
Answer:
Niether of the party to contract earned any gain on this investment
Explanation:
The reason is that the both companies exchanged assets whose Fair Market value was equal to the amount received. This is because the Baron Corporation would would had written down its asset at FMV which means the asset is sold at a price that actually costs the Broom Corporation if it uses the asset for its rest of the life. Furthermore, the Docker will also not recognize any gain on the stock repurchased sold because it is not permitted in the accounting standard.
