Answer:
If Jeff's wage rate rises, he decides to work more hours. From this, we can infer that for Jeff, the substitution effect is greater than the income effect - option C.
Explanation:
The substitution effect is stronger than the income effect in a case whereby the supply of labor increases as the wage rate increases .
On the other hand, when the supply of labor decreases as the wage rate increases, then the income effect is stronger than the substitution effect.
With regards to the scenario given in the question - with an increase in the wage rate, Jeff has decided to work more hours.
Thus, in the given case, it can be inferred that for Jeff, the substitution effect is greater than the income effect.
Therefore, the correct answer is option C.
Answer:
False.
Explanation:
Soceital marketing is the concept that marketing should not only consider the consumer's need for satisfaction and the companie's goal of maximising profit, but also societie's long term goals.
Soceital marketing is concerned with companies identifying the wants and needs of particular target maket, and providing products in such a way that the target market is satisfied. The well-being of the consumer and society at large is enhanced.
False. You should worry MORE about business ethics when you work for yourself to ensure for a better business and avoid getting sued
Answer:
$169.07
Explanation:
Data provided in the question:
Loan amount = $29,000
Time = 10 years
Interest rate = 7% compounded monthly
Therefore,
Interest rate per period, r = 7% ÷ 12 = 0.583% = 0.00583
number of periods, n = 10 × 12 = 120 months
Now,
Loan amount = Monthly payments × [ { 1 - (1 + r )⁻ⁿ } ÷ r]
on substituting the respective values, we get
$29,000 = Monthly payments × [ { 1 - (1 + 0.00583 )⁻¹²⁰ } ÷ 0.00583]
or
$29,000 = Monthly payments × 171.53
or
Monthly payments = $169.07
Answer:
b. the implied warranty of merchantability
Explanation:
Implied warranty of merchantability refers to an implied assurance, in every sales transaction that the seller's goods are safe and fit for intended purpose of usage.
It represents an unspoken guarantee on the part of the seller that his goods conform to the acceptable standards and properly packaged and labeled and abide by the promises conveyed on their label.
The motive behind such a warranty being, the seller must properly inspect and test the quality of his goods before releasing them or making them available for sale in the market.
In the given case, the seller sold skis to the customer which cracked into two upon usage. The seller isn't aware of the cause of the consequence. Thus, the seller breached the principle of implied warranty of merchantabilty as per which, it should've first checked and inspected the skis before making them available for sale.