Answer:
For it and against it
Explanation:
dont really know how to explain it but basically for paragraph one you are writing why you should be for it (in favor of; pro) and for paragraph 2 you are writing why you should be against it (opposed to; con)
hope that helps :)
<span>George Santayana is the answer my friend.</span>
Machiavelli describes three ways to hold states that have
been accustomed to living freely under their own laws. The first
is to devastate them. The second is for the conqueror to occupy
them. The third is to allow the state to maintain its own laws,
but to charge taxes and establish an oligarchy to keep the state
friendly. The third option is advantageous because the newly imposed
oligarchy will work hard to secure the authority of the conquering
prince within the conquered state because it owes its existence
to the prince and cannot survive without his support. Thus, as long
as the goal is not to devastate the other state, it is easiest to
rule it through the use of its own citizens.
Hope this helps, took me awhile to type it all. :)
D a state gets as many electoral votes as the number of it's senators and representatives.
Answer:
I think option c is correct.
Explanation:
Liberty?” Thus exclaimed one of the signs protesters held in front of the White House gates in February 1917. Women’s fight for the right to vote was in its final years, but in the heavy sacrifice and a changing understanding of the meaning of democracy the war brought, the movement had found a renewed energy and enthusiasm during World War I. Female protesters initially faced a cordial but outwardly uninterested reception from President Woodrow WIlson, but they were persistent. The protest lasted until November of that year, resulting in many women arrested and jailed for their efforts.
