Answer:
8.66%
Explanation:
The computation of the rate of return for the investor in the fund is as follows:
= (Net assets at the end + dividend per share - nav at the beginning of the year) ÷ (nav at the beginning of the year)
where,
Net assets at the end is
= $203 million + $203 million × 7% - ($217.21 million × 0.75%)
= $203 million + $14.21 million - $1.6291 million
= $217.21 million - $1.6291 million
= $215.58093 million
Dividend per share is
= $5 million ÷ 10 million shares
= 0.5
Nav at the beginning of the year is
= $203 million ÷ 10 million shares
= $20.3
Now the rate of return is
= ($215,.58093 + 0.5 - $20.3) ÷ ($20.3)
= 8.66%
Answer: 9.7%
Explanation:
Given Data
Rf = Risk free return = 6%,
Rpm = Risk premium = 4%,
Beta = 0.9
Wd = Debt = 20%
rd = cost of debt = 8%
We = equity = 80%
Re = Rf + Beta (Rpm)
= 0.06 +0.9 (0.04)
= 0.096 * 100
= 9.6%
Unlevered Equity Cost ;
ReU= Wd × rd + We × re
= 0.20 × 8% + 0.80 × 9.6%
= 9.28%
Levered Equity Cost:
New Debt = 60%,
New Equity = 40%,
New rd = 9%
ReL = ReU + (ReU - rd) (D ÷ E)
= 9.28% + (9.28% - 9%) (0.60 ÷ 0.40)
= 0.097 * 100
= 9.7%
An economy is operating at full employment, and then workers in the bread industry are laid off. this change is portrayed in the movement from C to F.
The economy in points A, B, C, and D is at full employment. Some employees make bread, while others make wine. Points F and G depict scenarios where the unemployment rate varies depending on the state of the economy. Point E illustrates a growing economy that is performing above its maximum level of employment. When the unemployment rate is between 4% and 5%, an economy is considered to be in full employment; nonetheless, frictional unemployment is always present.
Given that the economy was at full employment when the question was asked, but that unemployment then rose, the starting point must be A, B, C, or D, and the final position must be F or G. Only option D, from points C through F, makes sense.
An economy is operating at full employment, and then workers in the bread industry are laid off. this change is portrayed in the movement from C to F.
To learn more about the above question, visit the following link:
brainly.com/question/14549969
#SPJ4
M1: 4750
2500 billion in the economy
Answer:1. The reason that the varsity team lost to JV team is lack of working together as a team.
2.Coach P. when selecting the rowers for the two teams should have looked at both the psychological(personality types and traits, if they are leader or followers etc.) as well as the physical aspect ( Stamina, Speed ,Coordination, Strength etc.) of each individual.
explanation:
1:Even though the varsity team consisted of the best individuals for speed , strength, coordination and endurance, they lacked the cohesiveness to perform as a unit. Each of the eight individual rowers had to be single-mindedly attuned to one another in order to synchronize their rowing and perform in unison. Unfortunately, the team also too many disruptor and lacked a leader.
2:The Coach should have experimented more by creating different scenarios to see how well the individuals responded and performed to one another in different situations when it came to a team environment. For example, putting the rowers in total control of the team's dynamics is the best hands on lesson they could ever experience. This would have allowed the rowers a deeper understanding what it take to be winner from a loser.
3.Coach P. should switch both the teams for Tuesday since after extensive observations and evaluation he has witnessed JV work as a better team. The JV team possessed better synergy, synchronization, and shared a common goal causing them to win more frequently than the Varsity team, despite the fact that the Varsity team had better individual members. In addition, there has been a precedent for switching boats. During the mid-1990’s, the Cornell Coach faced asimilar situation as Coach P. and as a result of him making the switch, both the JV and Varsity teams ended up winning the Eastern Championships. This demonstrates that it is more likely thatthe teams will win if they agree to switch. Moreover, even if Coach P. decided not to switch the teams, it would have taken quite a while to rebuild Varsity’s team structure, morale, and overall team synergy, implying that they probably would not have been ready in time to compete and win the race as the Varsity team anyway.
