Answer:
B) to restrict foreign influence in a sector
C) to restrict importation of a foreign good
D) to raise the price of foreign goods
E) to punish other countries
Explanation:
It is B, because a country looks after it's own citizens first, not the world. To do so, the government must be able to provide what it can to keep the GDP & economy growing, which also means keeping jobs in the country.
It is C, because the country generally wants to promote their own countries products to help stimulate the economy. If there is a large influx of foreign goods, the money would essentially "leak" out of the economy.
It is D, because when you are limiting goods, most of the time you are imposing tariffs and taxes on foreign goods. Because companies need a profit, they would have to raise the price to keep to what their profits want.
It is E, especially for the US, when they impose tariffs on countries who do not obey what the US wants. This works effectively, because of the US's role in the world.
~
American colonizers forced the native peoples of the Americas from their indigenous lands onto reservations along the frontier. This is an example of: <u>effect of </u><u>globalization</u>.
Globalization is the process of interaction and integration among people, companies, and governments worldwide. Globalization has accelerated since the 18th century due to advances in transportation and communications technology.
The primary objectives of Indian reservations were to subjugate indigenous Americans to U.S. government rule, reduce hostility between Indians and settlers, and prod Native Americans to adopt white culture. A billion people's lives were enhanced by globalization, which also assisted in lifting billions of others out of terrible poverty. The country's yearly GDP increased by an estimated 11% to 19%
.
To learn more about Globalization, refer
brainly.com/question/12049007
#SPJ4
Answer:
Nativist
Explanation:
Professor Chan most likely suscribes to the Nativist theory of language learning. This is a theory that has been defended mainly by language theorist Noam Chomsky. This theory states that children do not learn language exclusively because they imitate others. Instead, children are born with the innate capacity to understand language. Therefore, this is a biologically-based theory.
They do not need to be concerned because of the fact they <span>are not elected, they are appointed for life. </span>
