The region which is well know for its urban settings is Dubai
Answer:
How Checks and Balances Work The U.S. government exercises checks and balances through its three branches— the legislative, executive, and judicial branches. It operates as a constitutionally limited government and is bound to the principles and actions that are authorized by the federal—and corresponding state—constitution.
Explanation:
Tatami or tatamis are woven straw mats, used in Japanese homes, generally as floor coverings.
- these are rectangular in shape
- Traditionally, rush grass was woven around a rice straw core to keep the tatami mat firm. However, now the rice straw core is often replaced with more modern materials, such as wood chips or polystyrene foam.
- In shinden and shoin domestic architecture, tatami completely cover the floor.
- From primitive times, the floor has remained the common surface for sitting and sleeping in Japanese architecture.
- The mats work well with the unique climate of Japan, which is hot and humid in the summer and cold and dry in the winter, and the tatami mats evidently help regulate interior humidity.
To know more about Japanese architecture click here
brainly.com/question/8988982
#SPJ4
It would be the self-determination theory. He's intrinsic motivation of becoming a lawyer, or as the theory says, the happiness of taking up law is lost. And the mentions of the extrinsic motivation here may mean, the only motivation Ken have for law may be just to earn money, to just finish school or just for the sake of his parents.
Answer:
In Schenck v. United States, the Supreme Court <u><em>ruled that bans on dangerous speech were constitutional.</em></u>
Explanation:
In the 1919 Supreme Court case of Schenck v. the United States, the court deemed the actions of Charles Schenck and Elizabeth Baer as unconstitutional. It deemed them criminals for trying to obstruct the government's drafting of men for war and that it is an act against the security of the nation.
This case revolves around the claim that the obstruction of Schenck and Baer's free speech was unconstitutional and they have the right to express their opinions. But the court insisted that since the leaflets they distributed were against national security, the First Amendment doesn't apply to them.
Thus, the correct answer is the second option.