Answer:
O+ a. Increase in accounts payable
F- b. Payment of dividends
O- c. Decrease in accrued liabilities
F+ d. Issuance of common stock
O- e. Gain on sale of building
O+ f. Loss on sale of land
O+ g. Depreciation expense
O- h. Increase in merchandise inventory
O+ i. Decrease in accounts receivable
I- j. Purchase of equipment
Explanation:
The requirement of the question is to indicate whether each of the items is an addition to addition to net income (O+) or subtraction (O-) under operating activities section, investing activity (cash inflow I+), (cash outflow I-),financing activity (cash inflow F+), (cash outflow F-) and activity not used to prepare the cash flows.
All the signs above are correct.
Answer:
A. Cost of funds has changed
B. Firm's risk has changed
Explanation:
The required rate of return on bonds refers to an investor's expected rate of return which is based upon rate of return other investors earn in the market on similarly priced bonds. This is also referred to as yield to maturity i.e YTM.
Coupon rate of payment of bond is the interest payment on such bonds which is usually fixed at the time of issue of such bonds.
Required rate of return may differ on account of change in cost of funds to the issuer which is cost of debt denoted as 
. Cost of debt is determined by tax rate and net proceeds from the issue of such bonds.
Required rate of return may also change on account of change in the firm's risk. If the firm assumes more risk, such risk would deter investors from investing in such bonds and in such scenario, the firm has to offer higher coupon rate than the rate prevailing in the market to attract the investors.
Answer:
False.
Explanation:
The concept of "Nash equilibrium" is been by economist and also by "gamers" in game theory. Nash equilibrium is so good for making decisions and the determination of strategies.
In playing this game, the players or participants can use the pure strategy or the mixed strategy. The mixed strategy is the use of different strategies randomly.
"If a player chooses a mixed strategy in a Nash equilibrium, this implies that the payoff from using that mixed strategy is the same as the payoff from using any of the pure strategies in it".
The statement given above is FALSE because the PAYOFF WILL INCREASE IF WE ARE TO PLAY A MIXED STRATEGY.
For instance if we have a head of 1 and -1, and a tail of -1 and 1, the payoff for pure strategy is likely one or minus one but for a mixed strategy it could be zero.
I think at least 3-4
Dudhdhdhdhxhxjc
