Answer:
Customer may not want the product which the company is making well.
Explanation:
It is not necessary that market needs those products which the company is producing perfectly. It cannot enter into product differentiation and cannot meet customer demands and needs of specific or altered products. The company can achieve specialization and can be a niche player in the market but also on the other hand company’s business is limited to only few products at which it is perfect. It cannot allow customization to its products.
Answer:
B. The denial is justifiable given the level of interbrand competition.
Explanation:
Anti trust law only applicable if you can proof that two or more producers in the same industry work together in order to assert their control over the market. They can do this through price fixing, controlling the amount of supply, etc.
This condition<em> can't be found</em> in the scenario above.
The denial that done by PepsiCo is justifiable because in a really competitive market, a company need to impose a strict requirement on which entities they should form a dealership relation with. If PepsiCo choose the wrong dealers, Its competitors could easily taken over the market and resulted in a huge amount of loss for the company.
Answer: Restructuring cost
Explanation:
Restructuring cost could be described as making expenses on rejuvenating or reviving or rebranding the company through spendings, which affects most of it's mode of operations, brings a change and innovation and ways to improve existing methods. This is capital intensive due to the work and changes required during the process.
