1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Gnesinka [82]
3 years ago
12

Which was a result of the Pequot War and King Philip’s War? A.

History
2 answers:
lisov135 [29]3 years ago
7 0
I think B. Many Indians and colonists died.
GrogVix [38]3 years ago
7 0
We know that it wasn't D because during the revolutionary war Indians were allies to both sides. C really doesn't make a lot of sense. Therefore A is the best answer. I hope this helps and if it does please mark me the Brainliest. :D
You might be interested in
Which event is best represented in the political cartoon below?
algol [13]

Answer:

Roosevelt's use of the Sherman Anti-trust Act

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
3. Which branch did the framers (writers) of the US Constitution think should be the most powerful
dexar [7]

Answer:

legislative branch

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Why did women attend church,there to five<br> times daily?
Ksju [112]

Answer:

They were known to attend church three to five times daily for prayer and at least once a week for services.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
What was a MAIN reason why the Eastern Roman Empire lasted so much longer than the Western Roman Empire?
zhenek [66]

Answer:

"Fall of Rome" redirects here. For other uses, see Fall of Rome (disambiguation).

"The Fall of the Roman Empire" redirects here. For the film, see The Fall of the Roman Empire (film).

The fall of the Western Roman Empire (also called the fall of the Roman Empire or the fall of Rome) was the process of decline in the Western Roman Empire in which the Empire failed to enforce its rule, and its vast territory was divided into several successor polities. The Roman Empire lost the strengths that had allowed it to exercise effective control over its Western provinces; modern historians posit factors including the effectiveness and numbers of the army, the health and numbers of the Roman population, the strength of the economy, the competence of the Emperors, the internal struggles for power, the religious changes of the period, and the efficiency of the civil administration. Increasing pressure from invading barbarians outside Roman culture also contributed greatly to the collapse. The reasons for the collapse are major subjects of the historiography of the ancient world and they inform much modern discourse on state failure.[1][2][3]

376, unmanageable numbers of Goths and other non-Roman people, fleeing from the Huns, entered the Empire. In 395, after winning two destructive civil wars, Theodosius I died, leaving a collapsing field army and the Empire, still plagued by Goths, divided between the warring ministers of his two incapable sons. Further barbarian groups crossed the Rhine and other frontiers and, like the Goths, were not exterminated, expelled or subjugated. The armed forces of the Western Empire became few and ineffective, and despite brief recoveries under able leaders, central rule was never effectively consolidated.

By 476, the position of Western Roman Emperor wielded negligible military, political, or financial power, and had no effective control over the scattered Western domains that could still be described as Roman. Barbarian kingdoms had established their own power in much of the area of the Western Empire. In 476, Odoacer deposed the last emperor in Italy, and the Western Senate sent the imperial insignia to the Eastern Emperor.

While its legitimacy lasted for centuries longer and its cultural influence remains today, the Western Empire never had the strength to rise again. It never again controlled any portion of Western Europe to the North of the Alps. The Eastern Roman, or Byzantine Empire survived, and though lessened in strength remained for centuries an effective power of the Eastern Mediterranean.

While the loss of political unity and military control is universally acknowledged, the Fall is not the only unifying concept for these events; the period described as Late Antiquity emphasizes the cultural continuities throughout and beyond the political collapse.

3 0
3 years ago
What best describes the effect of Napoleon’s economic reforms on the people of France?
Margarita [4]

Answer:

Explanation:

Napoleon's reforms helped many people. He implemented tariffs and loans in order to build up the war torn country. Public schools, relations with the church, new infrastructure, were all improved and built. He also laid the foundation for the Bank of France to regulate inflation, etc.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • In 1920 was money put into the economy through mass consumerism true or false?
    13·2 answers
  • Industrialization resulted in what changes to American story
    8·1 answer
  • What is the main reason Thomas Paine published common sense
    6·1 answer
  • Why is it important for citizens to pay their taxes?
    13·2 answers
  • Kim ii-sung was the leader of
    13·2 answers
  • I need help to study the Gettysburg address
    8·1 answer
  • What are two causes of poverty in Nigeria
    15·1 answer
  • Who greeted the third class passengers on the titanic
    14·1 answer
  • GIVING BRAINLIEST
    7·2 answers
  • what type of tide would the earth have when the moon is in this position? A. only low tides B. only high tides C. only neap tide
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!