Serial-position effect is the ability to recall items in the begining or the end of a list easier
Answer:
This question lacks answers
A. currency swap.
B. arbitrage.
C. backwardation.
D. straddle.
<u>The answer is </u><u>b.</u>
Explanation:
Arbitrage is a common practice used to gain profits from inefficient markets. Since most financial markets are inefficient by nature, dealers and similar business entities that have an interest in this kind of business practice.
The profit in arbitrage is based on the <u>imbalance in the two prices</u> on each market respectively. The term is mainly used for financial markets and various financial instruments (securities, bonds, currencies).
In the example above, the dealer becomes an arbitrageur by making a profit from the difference in the yen/dollar exchange rate in two markets (NY and London.)
Saving means the amount of income that is not spent on a particular product.
The member of the store will save $5 if they return an item costing $240.
<h3>What is saving?</h3>
Saving is defined as the part of income not spent, or delayed consumption. Methods of saving, consider putting money set aside.
<u>Example:</u>
A deposit account, a pension account, an investment fund, or cash. Saving also refers to separating down expenditures, like recurring costs.
In the above situation, it is clearly mentioned that if any member would return the item which costs above $100, then he would save $5. So here the item which the member is returning is above $100 then, the member would save $5.
He would pay only $235 ($240-$5).
Therefore, the member will save $5, on returning the item.
To learn more about saving, refer to:
brainly.com/question/7965246
Answer: Please refer to Explanation.
Explanation:
Two Companies. We shall call them A and B.
If A and B decide not to advertise, they both get $5,000,000.
If A advertises and B does not then A captures $3 million from B at a cost of $2 million meaning their payoff would be,
= 5 million - 2 million + 3 million
= $6 million.
A will have $6 million and B will have $2 million as $3 million was captured from them. This scenario holds true if B is the one that advertises and A does not.
If both of them Advertise, they both reduce their gains by $2 million while capturing $3 million from each other so they'll essentially both have just $3 million if they both decide to advertise.
With the above scenarios, it is better for both companies to ADVERTISE if there is NO COLLUSION. This is because it ensures that they do not get the lowest payoff of $2 million if the other company decides to advertise and they do not.
However, if they DO COLLUDE. They must both decide that NONE of them SHOULD ADVERTISE and this would leave them with their original $5 million each which is a higher payoff than the $3 million they will both receive if they were both advertising.
