Zeus chained prometheus to a rock in the middle of the ocean where an eagle constantly attacked him
Answer:
Grihastha is a oem and Asthma is stage thus Householder.
Explanation:
- Grihastha ashrama is a stage of life during which he or she s literally occupied by the moral duties of the home and is seen in Hindu traditions as one's s family after which the Brahmacharya or student life embodies a married life.
- Thus the person till the age of 25 lives with his parents and family life and after which gets married and lives his own life. The Christian Asharma stage is preceded by the brahmacharya stage.
Answer:
The correct answer is C: the economic flight of Caribbean peoples across the globe
Explanation:
First of all, it is worth stating that the term "diaspora" means the spread of individuals from their homeland. The Caribbean region has experienced several periods of economic hardship as well as military governments who made people leave their countries of origin. People migrate since they want to find better employment opportunities, better education, better ways of living. Some people also migrate due to natural disasters (floods, hurricanes). In the case of Caribbean people, they want to find a better way of living, they want to escape from poverty, lack of access to basic services, high crime, lack of security, as many Caribbean governments are oppressive and they do not guarantee basic individual rights.
The writings of Jean Bodin provides us with an early theorisation of the idea of sovereignty even though the examples he uses are quite extensive. Essential to Bodin's notion of sovereignty is that the power the sovereign holds must be absolute and permanent. If a ruler holds absolute power for the duration of his life he can be said to be sovereign. In contrast, an elected official or some other person that holds limited powers can not be described to be sovereign. Although at times Bodin suggests that the people are sovereign, his definition of sovereignty as absolute, unlimited and enduring power points purposively towards a positive association of sovereignty and a singular monarchical, or even tyrannical, power.
Another qualification that Bodin introduces into the definition of sovereignty as absolute and perpetual is one that will become increasingly important in subsequent theorisations, culminating in the work of Carl Schmitt. For Bodin, a sovereign prince is one who is exempt from obedience to the laws of his predecessors and more importantly, those issued by himself. Sovereignty rests in being above, beyond or excepted from the law. Although it occupies a subordinate place in Bodin's theorisation, it could be said that this exception from being subject to the law is the quintessential condition of sovereignty in so far as it is understood politically.
Although for Bodin sovereignty is characterised by absolute and perpetual power he goes on to make a series of important qualifications to this concept. These come from two principle concerns. The first is real politics - Bodin seems to be aware that absolute power could licence behaviour injurious to sovereign authority. Hence for example a sovereign cannot and should not confiscate property nor break contractual agreements made with other sovereigns, estates nor private persons. The second reason is Bodin's underlying theological notion of divine authority and natural law. A sovereign may put aside civil law, but he must not question natural law (in which it appears right of property is sanctioned). Saying this, it is ultimately from this divine authority that the earthly right of sovereign power is legitimated. The prince literary does god's bidding, and yet by virtue of this can do wrong. Hopefully this helps out some :)
I believe that this is true
