Political trends regarding the level of government involvement in social issues are reflected by the success of conservative or liberal perspectives in political parties, in the sense of favoring greater or lesser government involvement in social issues.
The liberal perspective favors greater government regulation in the marketplace and less government involvement in personal privacy issues. Liberalism is only in favor of government intervention of private property rights and freedom.
On the other hand, from the conservative perspective, there is a favoring of lesser government protectionism in the market, private property and trade.
Regarding social issues, the conservative ideology favors the government to be less involved in decisions so that greater social and economic equality is achieved.
Learn more here:
brainly.com/question/2261035
A beneficiary is currently eligible for medicare part A, who enrolls into part B is called an Original Medicare beneficiary.
Usually, individuals that are eligible for part B medicare are the following:
Those collecting Social Security retirement benefits;
Those collecting Social Security disability benefits for 24 months;
Those qualified to Medicare Part A.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that a beneficiary is currently eligible for medicare part A, who enrolls into part B is called an Original Medicare beneficiary.
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/10641128
Answer:
by producing numerous books ,articles, essays inventions, scientific discoveries revolutions, laws and wars
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Whenever a collision occurs on the road, the best thing to do is to move somewhere where you will be in the least amount of danger, and also not endanger other drivers. In this case it would be best to move to the other side of the road, at the furthest possible location from the collision. Parking near the collision puts people in danger as emergency services have to then move around the vehicle and this will take them longer.
The correct answer is: it is possible that an interest in politics caused Jessica to join the <span>political science club.
The argument in the question is flawed because it automatically assumes that Jessica's </span>involvement in her school's political science club led her to take an interest in politics, rather than the other way round, when in fact it is possible that an interest in politics is what actually caused Jessica to join the political science club. The argument in the question is flawed because it made a causal claim simply by an unfounded assumption.
