1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
shusha [124]
3 years ago
14

You are analyzing a stock that has a beta of 1.25. The​ risk-free rate is 3.7 % and you estimate the market risk premium to be 5

.9 %. If you expect the stock to have a return of 13.2 % over the next​ year, should you buy​ it? Why or why​ not? The expected return according to the CAPM is nothing​%. ​(Round to two decimal​ places.) Should you buy the​ stock? ​(Select the best choice​ below.)
Business
1 answer:
Anna71 [15]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

6.45% and no

Explanation:

As we know that

Expected rate of return = Risk-free rate of return + Beta × (Market rate of return - Risk-free rate of return)

= 3.7% + 1.25 × (5.9% - 3.7%)

= 3.7% + 1.25 × 2.2%

= 3.7% + 2.75%

= 6.45%

he Market rate of return - Risk-free rate of return) is also known as the market risk premium and the same is applied.

Now the next year expected rate of return is 13.2% so based on this the investor should not buy this stock as the calculated expected rate of return is less than the desired expected rate of return

You might be interested in
a semiannual interest of 3.5%. Any money he invests would have to be left in the fund for at least five years if he wanted to wi
Lemur [1.5K]

Answer:

Results are below.

Explanation:

Giving the following information:

The semiannual interest of 3.5%.

A) We need to calculate the nominal interest rate:

Nominal interest rate= 0.035/2= 0.0175

B) Real interest rate:

Real interest rate= (1.0175^2) - 1= 0.03531

It compounds interest twice a year. Therefore, is higher

C) Investment= $8,000

We will use the following formula:

FV= PV*(1+i)^n

n= 10

i= 0.175

PV= 8,000

FV= 8,000*(1.0175^10)

FV= $9,515.56

8 0
4 years ago
Henry works in the HR department of an advertising firm that has recently brought in employees specializing in analysis of large
Drupady [299]

Answer:

Explanation:

In Henry's case, as the manager is not going to take into consideration specific techniques of behavior, Henry must put emphasis on <em>practical but long-lasting feedback</em> so based on those guidelines the manager can start taking better decisions for the company to reach its consumers' expectations.

3 0
3 years ago
__________ worth, a frequently used measure of wealth, refers to the value of savings and checking accounts, real estate, automo
Anna11 [10]
Net worth is the answer
5 0
2 years ago
During its first and second years of operations, Rogers Company, a corporation using a periodic inventory system, made undiscove
elena-s [515]

Answer:

Net Income understated by $20,000

Explanation:

In the first year, closing inventory was overstated by $80,000. The implications of the above would be,

Net Income for the first year would be overstated by $80,000

In the Second year,

Opening Stock would be overstated by $80,000

Due to this, cost of production stands overstated by $80,000.

Now, given in the question that closing stock for second year is overstated by $60,000 i.e profits are overstated by $60,000.

This means, the net effect on profits would be, $80,000 less $60,000 i.e $20,000 understated profits for the second year.  

4 0
3 years ago
Suppose Potter Ltd. just issued a dividend of $2.50 per share on its common stock. The company paid dividends of $2.00, $2.07, $
Bogdan [553]

Answer:

Explanation:

Using dividend growth model formula for finding dividend per year can be used to find the growth rate per year;

The formula would be D1 = D0(1+g)

and D2 = D1(1+g)

D3 = D2 (1+g)  and so on....

Starting with 2.00 dividend,  <u>growth rate from yr1-yr2;</u>

2.07 = 2.00*(1+g)

Divide both sides by 2.00;

1+g = 2.07/ 2.00

1+g = 1.035

g = 1.035-1

g ( y1-y2) = 0.035 or 3.5%

<u>Growth rate from yr2-yr3;</u>

2.24 = 2.07(1+g)

Divide both sides by 2.07;

2.24/2.07 = 1+g

1.0821 = 1+g

1.0821-1 = g

g= 0.0821 or 8.21%

Therefore, g(y2-y3) = 8.21%

<u>Growth rate from yr3-yr4;</u>

2.34 = 2.24(1+g)

Divide both sides by 2.24;

2.34/2.24 = 1+g

1.0446 = 1+g

1.0446 -1 =g

g =0.0446 or 4.46%

Therefore, g(y3-y4) = 4.46%

<u>Growth rate from yr4-yr5;</u>

2.50 = 2.34(1+g)

2.50/2.34 = 1+g

1.0684 = 1+g

1.0684-1 = g

g=0.0684 or 6.84%

Therefore, g(y4-y5) = 6.84%

8 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • By the early 1990s, the world was spending how many dollars a year on war?
    7·1 answer
  • In a _____ organizational structure, personnel often report to both a functional manager and one or more project managers. matri
    8·1 answer
  • Changes in tariffs and quotas are: Group of answer choices infrastructure changes. corporate strategies designed to maximize pro
    7·1 answer
  • Andre Company does not segregate sales and sales taxes when it charges customers at the register. Its register total for a given
    10·1 answer
  • Mary from sales is asking about the plan to implement Salesforce's application. You explain to her that you are in the process o
    10·1 answer
  • Define fannie mae and freddie mac.​
    15·1 answer
  • For an academic entrepreneur based in a university, licensing-out a technology to a commercial partner may be more appropriate t
    10·1 answer
  • In today's manufacturing environment, there is a growing philosophy that supports the deployment of smaller, less directly manag
    7·1 answer
  • Describe four principles or organizations brought about by the Bretton Woods Agreement that remain important to international bu
    6·1 answer
  • Responses such as winning, displaying anger, and retaliating are considered _____ responses to conflict.
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!