Answer:
C) Kush leaders had pyramids built
Explanation:
The Kingdom of Kúsh was considered to be an ancient kingdom, located in the north of African region, around the Sudanese and southern Egyptian Nile Valley. considered to be in modern-day Sudan. Major part of the Kúsh region was inhabited around 8,000 BCE while the Kingdom of Kúsh appear much later. With history and archaeological evidence from Sudan and Egypt proving that Egyptians and Kúsh were in contact from since about 3150 - 2613 BCE onwards.
Thus, often civilization named as 'Kúshíte' was considered to have metamorphosed from the series of earlier culture mix that was heavily influenced by the Egyptians.
Therefore, there are various evidence that shows how Egyptian culture influenced Kúshíte culture, some of which are:
1. Kúshítes adopted various forms of Egyptian religion, art and architectures
2. Kúshítes built structures similar to Egyptians such as pyramids, temples, and burial mounds.
3. Kúshítes adopted Egyptian góds, like Amún and Isís.
4. They copied the written hieroglyphics of the Egyptians.
5. Kúshítes Kings ruled similar to Egyptian pharaohs and we're considered to be gód-like.
Hence, the statement that best identifies an Egyptian influence on Kúsh culture is "Kúsh leaders had pyramids built".
Answer:
A general lack of U.S. government regulations on business
Explanation:
Answer:
yes
Explanation:
its for me dysphoria i have no idea what i look like anymore
In Aldo Leopold’s ethics, actions can be distinguished through social approbation for right actions while social disapproval for wrong actions. This is in line with the mechanism of operation which is the same as any ethics. Social approbation is the society’s approval of one’s action. Since it is approved, it leads to the conclusion that a certain action is correct or right. However, during social disapproval, society doesn’t like the certain action or disapproves it leading to the conclusion that a certain actions showed is considered as inappropriate or wrong actions. These conclusions just coincide with the other ethics presented. Therefore society also play a big role in ethics.
Explanation:
Trade was also a boon for human interaction, bringing cross-cultural contact to a whole new level. When people first settled down into larger towns in Mesopotamia and Egypt, self-sufficiency – the idea that you had to produce absolutely everything that you wanted or needed – started to fade. A farmer could now trade grain for meat, or milk for a pot, at the local market, which was seldom too far away. Cities started to work the same way, realizing that they could acquire goods they didn't have at hand from other cities far away, where the climate and natural resources produced different things. This longer-distance trade was slow and often dangerous but was lucrative for the middlemen willing to make the journey. The first long-distance trade occurred between Mesopotamia and the Indus Valley in Pakistan around 3000 BC, historians believe. Long-distance trade in these early times was limited almost exclusively to luxury goods like spices, textiles, and precious metals. Cities that were rich in these commodities became financially rich, too, satiating the appetites of other surrounding regions for jewelry, fancy robes, and imported delicacies. It wasn't long after that trade networks crisscrossed the entire Eurasian continent, inextricably linking cultures for the first time in history. By the second millennium BC, former backwater island Cyprus had become a major Mediterranean player by ferrying its vast copper resources to the Near East and Egypt, regions wealthy due to their own natural resources such as papyrus and wool. Phoenicia, famous for its seafaring expertise, hawked its valuable cedarwood and linens dyes all over the Mediterranean. China prospered by trading jade, spices, and later, silk. Britain shared its abundance of tin.
My hands hurt now :')
Anyways Hope this helped, Have a nice day!
