1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
IceJOKER [234]
3 years ago
15

My brother loves to cook, he especially loves to barbecue. Which answer choice best corrects the run-on sentence? My brother lov

es to cook but he especially loves to barbecue. My brother loves to cook, but he especially loves to barbecue. My brother loves to cook: and he especially loves to barbecue. My brother loves to cook; and he especially loves to barbecue.
English
2 answers:
yanalaym [24]3 years ago
8 0

The correct answer is My brother loves to cook, but he especially loves to barbecue.

Explanation:

The sentence "My brother loves to cook, he especially loves to barbecue" is a run-on sentence because each of the sections in the sentence is a complete sentence, and complete/independent sentences cannot be connected using a comma. Instead, a semicolon should be used (;) or a conjunction such as and, but, or can be added after the comma. This second method of correction occurs in the sentence "My brother loves to cook, but he especially loves to barbecue".

Aloiza [94]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

The correct answer is My brother loves to cook, but he especially loves to barbecue.

You might be interested in
Does learning always have a positive effect on a persons life
DaniilM [7]
In my opinion, learning does continually have a positive effect on a person life. Learning new things give you a broader knowledge and experience. Learning is ongoing and will always be of positive gain in the right context.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What analogy is Emerson proposing in this passage?
coldgirl [10]
Hello,


<span>rose:present::man:past/future 

Have a great night!</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Can peoples money and possessions keep them happy ? Argument essay
son4ous [18]

Answer: There’s an old cliche that says, “Money can’t buy happiness.” But is that actually true? There’s research to suggest that, up until a certain income level, money certainly can have a positive impact on your happiness. In this article, we’re going to dive into some of the arguments on both sides of the debate.

Is it true that money can’t buy happiness? When it comes to the question of whether money can buy happiness, there’s a lot of research out there. The frustrating but true answer is: It depends. Money is a tool. If you use it correctly, it can absolutely have an impact on your happiness.

But it doesn’t necessarily increase our happiness in the ways you might expect it to. More money isn’t going to improve your mindset, and buying more stuff won’t really bring you more joy.

But money can also buy things like time and experiences which no doubt bring us happiness. It’s also a leading cause of stress (including debt stress) — stress that can be alleviated when we make enough to live comfortably.

Ways in which money can’t buy happiness

That old saying about money not being able to buy happiness has been around so along for a reason. Money can’t fix everything, and there are certainly ways that more money won’t lead to more happiness.

Money can’t change your mindset Your mindset has a significant impact on your happiness, and it’s something that money can’t fix. If you’re a glass-half-empty person without a lot of money, chances are that your mindset will be similar even once you have money.

Money can’t buy relationships, relationships are the most consistent predictor of happiness. When we have people in our lives who we love, we’re more likely to be happy. And ultimately, that’s something that money can’t buy.

Sure, there might be people who want to spend time with you because you have a lot of money. But those won’t be genuine relationships, and they aren’t likely to bring lasting happiness.

Material things don’t make us happy, when we get more money, perhaps as a gift or from a raise at work, many of us immediately jump to thinking about the material possessions we can buy. But those possessions don’t do much to increase our happiness.

Plenty of people have nice clothes or drive nice cars but still aren’t happy. In fact, many people use shopping as an escape when they’re unhappy, thinking it will increase their happiness. But ultimately, it doesn’t work.

You could certainly make the argument that money itself doesn’t make people happy. But there’s plenty of research that shows that when spent on the right things, money can have a dramatic impact on your happiness.

So it’s no surprise that having more money — at least enough to live comfortably and get out of the paycheck cycle — can reduce stress. And when people have less stress in their lives, they can focus on the things that make them happy.

Money can't buy happiness but it can lead you to it!

There are plenty of good points on both sides of the argument of whether money can buy happiness. Sure, the money itself doesn’t make you happy. And buying more possessions likely won’t either. But money is a tool. And when used properly, it can absolutely help you to reach financial goals that make you happier.

For some, that happiness looks like more time with family. For others, it’s simply the stress relief that comes with knowing you don’t have to worry about being late on your bills. It’s not the money that makes you happy — it’s how you use it.

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
Which example is presented in chronological order?
Anuta_ua [19.1K]
What examples? I can’t see them
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the key similarity between leo Tolstoy’s the death of Ivan IIyich and edvard munch’s panting the scream?
Kipish [7]

The key similarity between Leo Tolstoy’s the death of Ivan IIyich and Edvard munch’s panting the scream is both works are a depiction of the difficulties of everyday life.

Answer: Option A

<u>Explanation: </u>

The Death of Ivan Ilyich by Leo Tolstoy is about the difficulties of everyday life and by how one does not believe in the idea of the true connection with everyday life.The Scream by Edvard Munch is a representation of pain and suffering.

Thus, making pain and suffering as the similarities between these two. In general, Tolstoy has presented it in the form of a writing and Munch has represented it in the form of a painting.  So, the drawing of everyday life difficulties is similar primarily between them.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What does henry david thoreau have to say about the american government in his essay, "resistance to civil disobedience"?
    5·1 answer
  • Which of these corrects the inappropriate shift in mood in the following sentence?
    14·1 answer
  • What technology can't you live without and why?
    13·2 answers
  • "They got up and sauntered over to where Starks was living for the present. Already the town had found the strangers. Joe was on
    13·1 answer
  • .....hm, am I right?
    11·1 answer
  • perfect tenses Tomás is doing well. He _________ two excellent jobs since he graduated from high school. A. having B. has had C.
    9·1 answer
  • Pick one character from The Wife of Bath's Tale, "Lady Ragnell and Sir Gawain", OR "Sir Gawain and the
    12·1 answer
  • How does the use of time and tense create effect
    6·1 answer
  • Why would lynching still existe In the 1930's
    14·2 answers
  • What was a common job in the Southern colonies? Cabinetmaker Making clothes and shoes Rancher with cattle or sheep Shipbuilding
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!