Answer:
Congress was concerned about how admitting it as a slave state would affect representation and the balance of power between states.
Explanation:
During that period, Missouri was a huge area that was called Missouri Territory and by 1819, there were enough people in part of that so it could be considered a state. But to be considered a state the Congress had to approve it.
In that period there was a struggle between free states and pro-slavery states the union wanted a balance between those two and the addition of a new state could ruin that balance.
The admission of Missouri would have added a slave state to the Senate and left northern non-slave states as a minority. This is the reason the application of Missouri caused a two-year debate.
When a justice avoids interpreting the Constitution past its clear words, this is<u> judicial restraint.</u> But when a justice considers wider societal applications in decisions, this is<u> judicial activism. </u>
<h3>What are judicial activism and restraint?</h3>
Judicial activism refers to when a Judge/ Justice decides to consider the implications of their decisions when making court rulings. This can often lead to them making inferences on the Constitution.
This is the opposite of Judicial Restraint where a Judge/ Justice decides to interpret a law within the clear confines and words of the Constitution.
Find out more on Judicial Restraint at brainly.com/question/15452280.
Answer: The researcher is likely to be studying Behaviorism
Explanation:
Behaviorism, also known as psychology is a theory whose learning is based on idea, which believes that a behaviours are gathered as a result of conditioning.
And conditioning itself is as a result of interaction with environment/community or society at large.
Because the banks had closed down and they had know way to get what they needed.