They are alike insofar that they both deal with with people from minorities and and the discrimination against people who were not of European descent. In Mendez v. Westminster it was about Mexican American people while in the Magnuson Act it was about the Chinese American population and discrimination against them.
Answer: A) the constitution takes away more freedom than it gives
Explanation:
You can make stricter punishments on hate crimes.
Hope this helps!<span />
<h2>"Expressed powers" or "enumerated powers."</h2>
Enumerated powers are those powers specifically granted to the federal government by the United States Constitution.
Enumerated powers include such things as the power to coin/print money, the power to establish and impose tariffs, and the power to regulated trade with foreign nations and trade/commerce between states.
Strict constructionists and loose constructionists differ over whether the government's powers should be limited to those specifically enumerated powers. Strict constructionists read the Constitution as giving the federal government only those specifically delegated powers. Loose constructionists argue that anything not specifically forbidden by the constitution can be within the window of what the government needs to do in adapting to the needs of time and circumstances.
The correct answer for the question that is being presented above is this one: "FALSE." <span>Japan's involvement in China was the cause of the fall of the Tang Dynasty. This statement is not true. There were four reasons why the Tang Dynasty declined and Japan is not one of the reasons.</span>
