Scientists have different methods to help clean up oil spills in oceans, including the use of strong chemicals and the use of ba
cteria. What is an advantage of using bacteria instead of chemicals? Removal of the oil by bacteria is a slow process.
Bacteria likely cause less disruption to the natural environment.
Bacteria do not produce oxygen that could harm the oceans.
Removal of the oil by bacteria is more expensive than chemical methods.
Scientists have different methods to help clean up oil spills in oceans, including the use of strong chemicals and the use of bacteria. What is an advantage of using bacteria instead of chemicals?
Bacteria likely cause less disruption to the natural environment.
Explanation:
Usage of bacteria is ,ore of advantageous because of its environmental friendliness it has and the effectiveness would be last longer
I believe the last option is the correct one for the illustration of the single celled organism provides and the environment that it is found living in.
both c and d are pretty accurate, but i dont have very much knowledge on warblers specifically. but those 2 answers would be the most common for such a case