Hello. Unfortunately, you did not enter the excerpt these questions refer to. This makes it impossible for them to be answered. However, I will try to help you by showing you how you can answer them.
First, to answer these questions, you will need to read the entire excerpt. To answer the first question, it will be necessary for you to find, in this excerpt, a historical event, that is, an impacting historical moment that is being presented to the reader.
The second question asks you to present a point of view presented in the excerpt. A point of view is an opinion, a position of the author of the text about the subject presented in the text. You will also find this opinion after reading the excerpt.
To answer the third question you must associate the entire excerpt with the immigration that took place in Gilded Age and identify how this excerpt is associated with this immigration, that is, you must identify if this text shows a cause for this immigration, a result of this immigration, an element that was caused by this immigration, among others.
The Iran-Contra affair was a scandal involving the US and Iran. Iran was at an arms embargo at the time, so no arms were supposed to be sold to this country. The US though was secretly selling arms to Iran. This came out on the surface and became a big scandal. The US administration was trying to justify this move that they have done it order to free American hostages held in Lebanon by Hezbollah, but it turned out that the arms sale started much earlier then that. Apart from having a badly damaged reputation, both at home and on the international scene, the US success in the region was also damaged. The Arab world was a sworn enemy of Iran, and they thought that the US is their friend and protector, but it came on surface that the US is arming their enemy, so it disrupted the relations with these countries for the time being.
Answer:
The Purge
Explanation:
......................................
Answer:
No, Napoleon's rule definitely did not represent the fulfillment of the French Revolution ideals, because the French Revolution was a liberal revolution, in the sense that it sought the establishment of a new rule where personal liberties where respected, where people were equal before the law, and where the government was accountable to the people, and served the people.
Explanation:
Napoleon on the other hand, was simply a dictator. Perhaps a very skilled and smart dictator, but a dictator nonetheless. He was not accountable to the people, and could do with the country what he pleased. He got France involved in a series of wars (the Napoleonic Wars), imposed his dictatorial rule over most of Western Europe, and caused the dead of thousands of soldiers with his disastrous decision to invade Russia.
Napoleon was like a new monarch, and the French Revolution was so contrary to the monarchy that its leaders beheaded the last French King: Louis XVI. For all these reasons, Napoleon was the opposite to what the French Revolution sought.
