Explain the difference between judicial restraint and judical activism?

2 answers:

7 0

Judicial activism is the view that the Supreme Court and other judges can and should creatively (re)interpret the texts of the Constitution and the laws in order to serve the judges' own visions regarding the needs of contemporary society. Judicial activism believes that judges assume a role as independent policy makers or independent "trustees" on behalf of society that goes beyond their traditional role as interpreters of the Constitution and laws. The concept of judicial activism is the polar opposite of judicial restraint.

Judicial restraint refers to the doctrine that judges' own philosophies or policy preferences should not be injected into the law and should whenever reasonably possible construe the law so as to avoid second guessing the policy decisions made by other governmental institutions such as Congress, the President and state legislatures. This view is based on the concept that judges have no popular mandate to act as policy makers and should defer to the decisions of the elected "political" branches of the Federal government and of the states in matters of policy making so long as these policymakers stay within the limits of their powers as defined by the US Constitution and the constitutions of the several states.

photoshop1234 [79]3 years ago

5 0

Judicial restraint limits the powers of judges to strike down a law. As opposed to the progressiveness of judicial activism, judicial restraint opines that the courts should uphold all acts and laws of Congress and legislatures unless they oppose the United States Constitution.

You might be interested in

a protestant denomination emphasizing predestination is select one: a. lutheranism. b. calvinism. c. baptist. d. methodist.

kobusy [5.1K]

A protestant denomination emphasizing predestination is Calvinism.

Calvinism can be considered a major branch of Protestantism that follows religious and Christian beliefs set by John Calvin. It draws attention to the sovereignty of God and the authority of the Bible.

Whereas, Predestination Calvinism is to find answers to the questions about God's control over the world. Predestination states that God chooses the one he needs to save, whether or not the person believes on him.

This is where the argumentative phase starts in predestination and Calvinism. When a protestant denomination by drawing attention to predestination that is he/she believes that he has been saved by God eventually is surrendering themselves to the religious path that is Calvinism.

To know more about Calvinism,

brainly.com/question/22629874

8 0

8 months ago

What issues were unresolved at the end of the war of 1812

4vir4ik [10]

<span> It did not address the issue of </span>impressment<span>, one of the major causes of the war.</span>

3 0

3 years ago

Answer to this question is required.To what extent do you possess each of the following knowledge, skills and abilities (KSAs)?

Digiron [165]

Answer:

(1) Knowledge of and experience with analytical concepts, principles, and practices (methods) that provides the ability to analyze and evaluate qualitative and quantitative data to make logical inferences and/or draw logical conclusions.

Explanation:

This could be seen in the ability whereby scientists are trying to gain insight in this current pandemic through analysing and evaluation of the qualitative and quantitative data inorder to be able to find the solution.

7 0

3 years ago

Who were some of the first federalist and what did they belive

Keith_Richards [23]

Along with John Jay and Alexander Hamilton, James Madison panned. The Federalist Papers. The supporters of the proposed Constitution called themselves "Federalists." Their adopted name implied a commitment to a loose, decentralized system of government.

6 0

2 years ago

Kirby just got divorced. He is currently thinking about how disruptive and significant this life change will be for him. Accordi

Bumek [7]

primary appraisal

What is primary appraisal?

The process by which a person evaluates and gives meaning to a situation or possible stressor is known as primary evaluation.

During the initial evaluation of an event, a person assesses its relevance to them and the potential influence it will have. This leads to a more comprehensive classification of the incident, which affects how a person responds to it both internally and publicly.

For instance, getting snowed in could be rated as good (if it's a snow day and you were dreading school), bad (if you made plans with friends that you now have to cancel), or irrelevant (if you're sick and weren't intending on leaving the house anyhow).

Learn more about primary appraisal with the help of given link:-

brainly.com/question/8764080

#SPJ4

3 0

1 year ago