The answer is taxable income. It alludes to the base whereupon a pay assess framework forces an expense. By and large, it incorporates a few or all things of salary and is lessened by costs and different derivations. The sums included as wage, costs, and different conclusions fluctuate by nation or framework.
Answer:
1. $275 million
Yes
2. 30%
Explanation:
Calculation for the NPV of the investment opportunity
NPV = –100 + 30/0.08
NPV= $275 million
Therefore the NPV will be $275 million
Yes, Based on the above Calculation they should make the investment
2. Calculation for IRR
IRR: 0 = –100 + 30/IRR
Hence,
IRR = 30/100
IRR = 30%
Therefore the IRR will be 30%
The IRR is great only in a situation where the cost of capital does not go beyond 30%.
Frances must stand by his ethical standards and defer his plans to market the product.
Explanation:
Frances is stranded amidst classic case of an ethical dilemma. The ethical dilemma is an ethical perspective which puts a person in a state of to do or not. This is common and everyone undergoes through this phase for more than once in his/her lifetime.
The dilemma arises due to the substantiative profits that he can earn from marketing the product and his ethical concerns that the product is harmful for a section of the user. He needs to stick to his ethical standards and put the products to more rigorous tests and research. This would enable him to market his products in the future with some twitches and upholding his ethical concerns too.
