Answer:
Explanation:
Effective interest rate = [(Interest value of loan / Amount of loan after payment of interest) * (Number of months annually / Number of months notes hold)] * 100
= [($5,830 / $100,170) * (12 / 6)] * 100
= 0.1164 * 100
= 11.64%
1.
Computation the interest value of loan is:
Interest value of loan = Amount of loan * 8 / 12 * Percentage of discount
= ($106,000 * 6/ 12 )* 0.11
= $5,830
2.
Amount of loan after payment of interest = Amount of loan - Interest value of loan
= $106,000 - $5,830
= $100,170
Answer:
The correct answer is B) coercive.
Explanation:
A coercive boss is a rigid and inflexible leader. When this style is used, the leader chooses to give many direct orders without offering his subordinates the opportunity to express their ideas and opinions.
This leader not only does not opt for the reward system but also focuses on criticizing and punishing the failures generated by disobedience. Therefore, the motivation of the team suffers greatly from the inability of employees to perceive that thanks to their work, business objectives are being achieved.
It is usually the least effective management style but ... it may be recommended in crisis situations when it is necessary to show authority and employees need clear and direct orders.
The section of a business plan that contains information about the different departments in the company and what they do is the organization section.
In it, you can see all of the employees working in a certain company, and their jobs and activities are all enlisted in that part of the business plan. This is the easiest way to find a person you need, and who is the most suitable for a job that you want to hire them for.
Answer:
a. 274
b. 295
Explanation:
a. Optimum Order
Optimum Order = √( (2×Total Annual Demand×Ordering cost per order) / Holding Cost per unit)
= √ ((2×101×19×$39) / $2)
= 273.57
= 274
b. Optimum Order
Optimum Order = √( (2×Total Annual Demand×Ordering cost per order) / Holding Cost per unit)
= √ ((2×101×19×$39) / $8.20 ×0.21)
= 294.83
= 295
Answer:
C)
Explanation:
Based on the scenario being described it can be said that they would not be subject to this if the common stock were owned by a partnership where Edwards is not a partner. Most likely if the stocks were divided between Fifty-five shareholders who are related neither to each other nor to Edward, in equal lots of 10 shares each.
