All categories

3 years ago

Hey can you please help me posted picture of question

Mathematics

2 answers:

ruslelena [56]3 years ago

8 0

Yes he’s right it’s positive infinity so it’s C

xenn [34]3 years ago

4 0

The discriminant can be determined from the number of roots of the graph.

If Disc> 0, the function has two distinct roots
If Disc = 0, the function has a repeated root
If Disc < 0, the function has no real root.

Since, the given function has two distinct roots i.e. it cross x-axes at two different points, its discriminant will be positive.

So, the answer to this question is option C<span />

You might be interested in

A certain television is advertised as a 80-inch TV (the diagonal length). If the

Aleksandr [31]

Answer: 48 inches tall

Step-by-step explanation: (I just learned this) First, you square 80 and 64. 80 will be 6400 and 64 will be 4096. Then you use the Pythagorean Theorem, which is a² + b² = c². A. and B. are the legs in a triangle and C. is the hypotenuse. If you have A. and C. but not B, you square A. and C. and subtract C. from A. Then, after you get the number, you square that number, which will be√(2304), which makes 48.

3 0

3 years ago

Warren, a golf fan, was curious about how often professional golfers make successful putts from various distances. He looked at

anzhelika [568]

Answer:

Explained below.

Step-by-step explanation:

A correlation coefficient is a mathematical measure of certain kind of correlation, in sense a statistical relationship amid two variables

Negative correlation is a relationship amid two variables in which one variable rises as the other falls, and vice versa.

Values amid 0.7 and 1.0 (-0.7 and -1.0) implies a strong positive (negative) linear relationship amid the variables.

It is provided that Warren noticed a strong negative linear relationship between the success rate and putt distances.

This implies that as the putt distances are increasing the success rates are decreasing and as the putt distances are decreasing the success rates are increasing.

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

PLEASE ANSWER ASAP!!

Doss [256]

Answer:

It is 0.125

Step-by-step explanation:

5 0

2 years ago

PLS HELP GIVEN BRAINIEST ANSWER !!!!

ASHA 777 [7]

Answer:

65.45

Step-by-step explanation:

multiply 77 by 0.15 then substract that answer from 77 to get how long the video was after the cut.

7 0

2 years ago

3. The backyard of a home is a rectangle 25m by 30m. A garden of uniform width is to be

KiRa [710]

Answer:

Part A

The width of the garden is approximately 3.987 meters

Part B

Please find attached the drawing of the solution

Step-by-step explanation:

Part A

The given parameters are;

The dimensions of the backyard of the home = 25 m by 30 m

The width of the garden to be built in the yard = Uniform width

The shape of the grass left inside = Rectangular

The area of the grass at the center = The area of the garden

Let 'x' represent the width of the garden, we have;

The length of the rectangular grass area at the center, l = 30 - 2·x

The width of the rectangular area of grass at the center, w = 25 - 2·x

The area of the rectangular backyard, A = 30 m × 25 m = 750 m²

The area of the rectangular backyard, A = (The area of the garden) + (The area of the rectangle of grass inside)

The area of the rectangle of grass, GA = (30 - 2·x)·(25 - 2·x) = The area of the garden

The area of the rectangular backyard, A = 750 = (30 - 2·x)·(25 - 2·x) + (30 - 2·x)·(25 - 2·x) = 2 × (30 - 2·x)·(25 - 2·x) = 8·x² - 220·x + 1,500

∴ 750 = 8·x² - 220·x + 1,500

8·x² - 220·x + 1,500 - 750 = 0

8·x² - 220·x + 750 = 0

x = (220 ± √(220² - 4 × 8 × 750))/(2 × 8)

x ≈ 23.513, or x = 3.987

When x = 25.513, the width of the rectangle of grass inside, w = 25 - 2 × 23.513 = -22.026, which is not a natural (physically possible)

Therefore, the possible width of the garden, x ≈ 3.987

Part B

The drawing of the solution created with MS Visio is attached

6 0

2 years ago