I don't understand the question
Answer:
1. The narrator is a young European man who was hated by the Burmese people. His job as a Policeman worsened the hatred of him.
2. He was upset, sad, and angry at the treatment he received from the Burmese people.
Explanation:
In Shooting an Elephant, I could deduce that the narrator is a young European man who disliked his job and was hated by the Burmese people. The discrimination could be seen in his everyday life. When he went to play football, he was treated harshly by his playmates and referee.
On the streets, people sought to trap him and beat him up. The narrator was oppressed and the main reason could be attributed to his being a European. He secretly sided with the Burmese people and was against their British
Explanation:
The technique makes both excerpts effective is an appeal to logic.
Logos is the logic, reasoning and argument, or simulation of it, in a persuasive appeal.
Logos is a persuasive technique that tries to persuade an audience using logical arguments and supporting evidence.
Answer:
can you comment the rest of the paragraph under this answer? i think you forgot it...
Answer:
He inhaled deeply, and it was as though a part of the unseen something that constitutes nature had permeated the core of his being."
One his way up the lighthouse he stops at the shrine to give thanks to the deity for answering his prayer.
Explanation:
