by praising the efficiency of modern-day Internet research doesn't relate to anything regarding "Choreographers of Matter, Life, and Intelligence" when it comes to argumentation. Comparing scientific knowledge to grains of sand on a beach is poetic, but it is no argument either. Proving names of modern scientists and their contributions also shows nothing but the scientists and their contributions themselves. It doesn't work as proof for <em>"an impending scientific revolution".</em>
What Michio Kaku does, as the good scientist that he is, is to show evidence. And he does so "by providing quantitative proof of recent scientific progress"
Answer:
D. She knows that the lye she uses to make soap can also confirm whether the rock is gold.
Explanation:
In the text she says that if the rock is gold, it would not be harmed by the lye. This affects the plot because now they know that there will be a truthful possibility whether they found gold or not.
B. engineer would most likely use it
Thank you this is so sweet! you too!
