1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
likoan [24]
3 years ago
11

An electronics firm is currently manufacturing an item that has a variable cost of $0.50 per unit and a selling price of $1.00 p

er unit. Fixed costs are$14,000 per month. Current volume is 30,000 units per month. The firm wants to improve the product quality by adding a new piece of equipment at an additional fixed cost of $6,000 a month. Variable cost would increase to $0.60 a unit but volume should jump to 50,000 units a month due to improved productivity. Although the new product is of a higher quality, the firm intends to stay with the selling price of $1.00 per unit (for competitive purposes). (a) Should the firm buy the new equipment?(b) The firm is now considering stepping the new volume to 45,000 units a month to produce even better quality products and increase the selling price to $1.10 a unit. Under these circumstances, should the company buy the new equipment and increase the selling price?
Business
1 answer:
Ne4ueva [31]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Part (a) Should the firm buy the new equipment

The Firm Should not Buy the New Equipment since there is  No Profit ( instead $1000 Profit lost) from this decision and is in a worse off position than before.

Part (b) should the company buy the new equipment and increase the selling price?

The Firm Should Buy the New Equipment since an incremental Profit of $ 1500 is expected from this decision.

Explanation:

Part (a) Should the firm buy the new equipment

                                                 Do Not Buy      Buy New Equipment

                                                        $                                $

Sales                                             30,000                     50,000

Less Variable Cost                       15,000                      30,000

Contribution                                  15,000                      20,000

Less Fixed Costs                          14,000                      20,000

Net Income                                     1,000                           0

The Firm Should not Buy the New Equipment since there is  No Profit ( instead $1000 Profit lost) from this decision and is in a worse off position than before.

Part (b) should the company buy the new equipment and increase the selling price?

                                                 Do Not Buy      Buy New Equipment

                                                        $                                $

Sales                                             30,000                     49,500

Less Variable Cost                       15,000                      27,000

Contribution                                  15,000                     22,500

Less Fixed Costs                          14,000                      20,000

Net Income                                     1,000                        2,500

The Firm Should Buy the New Equipment since an incremental Profit of $ 1500 is expected from this decision.

You might be interested in
The following financial resources were among those received by Seco City during year 1:_____
Burka [1]

Answer:

A) $0

Explanation:

Seco City will record $0 as special revenue funds during year 1 with respect to the foregoing resources.

The $6,000,000 for acquisition of major capital facilities would be recorded as capital projects fund.

$2,000,000 to create a non-expendable trust would be recorded as private purpose trust fund.

8 0
3 years ago
Under absorption costing a company had the following per unit costs when 10,000 units were produced. Direct labor $ 2 Direct mat
Rudiy27

Answer: Total product cost per unit if 12,500 units = $13.

Explanation:

Given that,

Direct labor = $2

Direct material = $3

Variable overhead = $4

Total variable cost = $9

Fixed overhead ($50,000/10,000 units) = $5

Total product cost per unit = $14

Fixed Overhead at 12500 units = \frac{50000}{12500} = $4

∴  Total product cost per unit if 12,500 units = Total variable cost per unit + Fixed Overhead at 12500 units

= 9 + 4

= $13

6 0
3 years ago
Identify each person's status as employed, unemployed, "not in the labor force"
Ede4ka [16]

Answer:

Explanation:

a. "not in the labor force" since she is neither working or looking for a job and instead is studying

b. "employed", currently works as a tennis coach

c. "unemployed", she does not have a paying job yet but is looking for one

d. "not in the labor force", does not have a job and is not looking for one at the current moment in his life.

5 0
2 years ago
It is January 2nd. Senior management of Digby meets to determine their investment plan for the year. The current long-term debt
atroni [7]

Answer:

A) Total investment for Digby will be $2,518,806

D) Long term debt will increase from $33,862,062 to $34,888,934

Explanation:

The current Long-term debt is $33,862,062

Digby issues new shares of 50,000 with stock price $20.54.

50,000 shares * $20.45 = $1,027,000

Assets of Digby will rise by,

Assets / Equity = 2.45

Assets / $1,027,000 = 2.45

Assets = 2.45 * $1,027,000

Assets = $2,516,150

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Berry Good LLC registers its trademark with the U.S. Patent and Trademark office and uses it to market a distinctive line of ice
artcher [175]

Answer:

b. Creamy Inc.

Explanation:

From the question we are informed about Berry Good LLC which registers its trademark with the U.S. Patent and Trademark office and uses it to market a distinctive line of ice cream products. Creamy Inc. uses the mark without Berry's consent to sell imitation frozen desserts. Berry has a cause of action against Creamy Inc. What happen here was a Trademark infringement on Creamy Inc part. Infringement can be regarded as violation of exclusive rights that is associated with someone trademark. This as a result of not taken authorization from the owner of the Trade mark who has the licensees

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • In todayâs workplace, teams are a vital force, and the majority of business professionals must collaborate on the job. The trend
    8·1 answer
  • Question on job application ( I believe that rules often limits my productivity? True or not true?)
    15·2 answers
  • You're welcome. As a first step, our team analyzed the other potential primary contenders. The reality is that with such a stron
    8·1 answer
  • You’ve observed the following returns on Barnett Corporation’s stock over the past five years: –27.3 percent, 15.2 percent, 33.4
    9·1 answer
  • Harry recently purchased a new store-brand laundry detergent and was impressed by the product. He has decided that he is going t
    6·1 answer
  • The general ledger of Red Storm Cleaners has the following summary of the transactions for the year:
    9·1 answer
  • Jason Day Company had bonds outstanding with a maturity value of $300,000. On April 30, 2020, when these bonds had an unamortize
    12·1 answer
  • Tom and Jerry have two tasks to do all day: make dishes and build fences. If Tom spends all day making dishes, he will make 16 d
    15·1 answer
  • 11. Write down the importance of marketing mix?<br>बजारशास्त्र सम्मिश्रणको महत्त्व लेख्नुहोस्<br>।​
    13·1 answer
  • In one day madison laundry washed 4,000 pounds of laundry with 5 workers who each worked 8 hours. what was its productivity?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!