Answer:
The price elasticity of demand is 1.14.
The price is Elastic.
Elasticity is more than one so total revenue will fall.
Explanation:
Given the initial price of good x = $12
Final price of good x = $12.90
% change in price = [(12.90 - 12) / 12] x 100 = 7.5 %
Initial quantity = 5000
Final quantity = 4600
% change in quantity = [(4600 - 5000)/5000] x 100 = -8%
Elasticity = % change in quantity / % change in price
Elasticity = 8% / 7%
Elasticity = 1.14
The price elasticity of demand is 1.14.
The price is Elastic.
Since elasticity is more than one so total revenue will fall.
Answer:
1.) The internal controls which were missing are from the separation of responsibilities. There must have been in place an inner regulator were an individual works with advisers while alternative individual or unit take-care of the expense procedure, then somebody else allow expenses and then office should distribute the expenditures. There is an absence of inner controls as you can realize that the corporation amalgamated with a larger corporation and no one measured other accounts such as Jackson and company any longer.
2.) With the lack of control, this offered Helen the chance to effect the fraud. With this presence said, she was talented to emulate sign receipts and spend the retailer’s expenditures. She were also the one in responsibility of office the initial and final of accounts. In short, she had several accountabilities that should have remained separated up better and had diverse individuals for the separations of the job. In addition, she needed a bank description from the corporation where she was capable to put the expenditures and pay individual expenditures.
3.) The method this fraud might be noticed is the inspection squad can ask the bank for reports. They might also conference sellers. The accounting section should have ended sure they were doing the due diligence in dealers and corresponding the receipts with statements and expenditures.
Answer:
$5,641
Explanation:
DEPOSIT NOW
$1000 * FVIF 9%,8 PERIODS
= $1000 * 1.9926
= $1992.6
IN 2 YEARS
= $2000 * FVIF 9%,6 PERIODS
= $2000 * 1.6771
= $3354.20
IN 5 YEARS
= $8000 * FVIF 9%, 3 PERIODS
= $8000*1.2950
= $10360
WITHDRAWAL: IN 3 YEARS
= ($3000) * FVIF 9%, 5 PERIODS
= ($3000) * 1.5386
= ($4615.80)
IN 7 YEARS
= ($5000) * FVIF 9%, 1 PERIOD
= ($5000) * 1.0900
= ($5450)
Total value = $1992.6 + $3354.20 + $10360 - $4615.80 - $5450
Total value = $5,641
So, the total future value after eight years is $5,641
The correct answer is cover the actual production of a good or service.
Supply chain management choices are addressed, improved, and communicated with suppliers and consumers of a firm using the supply chain operations reference model (SCOR), a management tool. The operational methods required to satisfy client requests are described in the model.
<h3 /><h3>What does SCOR entail?</h3>
A supply chain must carry out the SCOR operations in order to achieve its main goal of completing client orders. There is only one representation for each distinct process in SCOR. The six main processes that SCOR identifies as level-1 processes are Plan, Source, Make, Deliver, Return, and Enable.
<h3>Why does business employ the SCOR model?</h3>
The SCOR method may assess the supply chain of a corporation at various degrees of process detail. It offers businesses a sense of how sophisticated their supply chain is. The procedure aids businesses in comprehending how the five procedures constantly recur between clients, suppliers, and the business itself.
To know more about Supply chain, visit: brainly.com/question/15582420
#SPJ4
