1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Vera_Pavlovna [14]
3 years ago
6

What social effects have resulted from population growth during the 20th and 21st centuries

History
2 answers:
Helen [10]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Throughout the twentieth century the population has more than quadrupled. And although there has been a decline in the population growth rate, it continues to increase by about 80 million each year, so it can double again in a few decades. The World Commission on Environment and Development (1988) has long pointed out the consequences: “In many parts of the world, the population grows at rates that the available environmental resources cannot sustain, rates that are exceeding all reasonable expectations of improvement in housing, medical care, food security or energy supply ”.

  • Around 40% of the primary photosynthetic production of terrestrial ecosystems is used by the human species every year to fundamentally eat, obtain wood and firewood, etc. That is, the human species is about to consume as much as all other species.
  • As explained by the Sustainability experts, within the framework of the so-called Rio + 5 Forum, the current population would require the resources of three Lands (!) To reach a standard of living similar to that of developed countries. It can be said, then, that we have already exceeded the carrying capacity of the planet, that is, the maximum number of human beings that the planet can maintain permanently. In fact, the biocapacity of the planet for each inhabitant has been estimated at 1.7 hectares (that is, the productive land available to meet the needs of each of the more than 7,000 million inhabitants of the planet) while currently the ecological footprint Average per inhabitant is 2.8 hectares.
  • “Even if they consume, on average, much less than today, the nine billion men and women who will populate the Earth by 2050 will inevitably subject it to enormous stress” (Delibes and Delibes, 2005).
jolli1 [7]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

birth rate, death rate, immigration, and emigration.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
The banking crisis of the early 1930s was the result of
sergey [27]
A.the lack of overall deposit
3 0
3 years ago
Which was the significance of Woodstock in 1969?
MissTica
Conceived as "Three Days of Peace and Music," Woodstock was a product of a partnership between John Roberts, Joel Rosenman, Artie Kornfield and Michael Lang. Their idea was to make enough money from the event to build a recording studio near the arty New York town of Woodstock
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How was the economic development of western europe during the cold war years similar to japan?
Evgen [1.6K]
<span>Japan signed a peace treaty with the United States to regulate their devastating  hope that helps and good luck
</span>
4 0
3 years ago
What was the inspiration for much of the experimentation with theatrical forms and techniques from 1945 to 1975 and specifically
Tema [17]

Answer:

Theater in the 20th century continues with the 19th century "theme" of realism and Naturalism, but experimental theater gained immense popularity and dominating this century theater "theme". Experimental theater used modernist, postmodernist  movements, and political theater aesthetics as inspiration. Such theaters was the Theater of the Absurd.

The Theater of the Absurd drew inspiration from existentialism as an idea as a form of experimental theater, playwrights of numerous Theater of the Absurd used techniques from trailblazers who came before them. This experimental theater came right in time post World War II.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
how is life in turkey today similar to life under the leadership of kemal Atatürk? how is it different?​
harkovskaia [24]

Answer:

Turkey as a country under the rule of Erdogan has changed in different ways.

Kemal Ataturk who was the previous President was more democratic in his style of rule. President Erdogan however succeeded him and changed how he ruled the people.

His style of ruling the people has been widely condemned as a step in the wrong direction due to his Islamic Dictatorship rule in the country.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The Murray _____ is in eastern Australia.
    5·1 answer
  • The religious that had the strongest influence on southeast asia were ?
    7·1 answer
  • What is the paradox regarding congress and public opinion? ap gov?
    12·1 answer
  • Cuánto dinero costaba un esclavo?
    14·1 answer
  • All of the following are jobs given to the president in the constitution except:
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following best states Alexander Hamilton’s attitude toward the conflict between Great Britain and France?
    15·2 answers
  • Immigrants who live in a country and are not citizens are known as ________.
    12·2 answers
  • When Stephen F. Austin returned to Texas after his time in prison, what message did he have for his fellow Texans?
    5·1 answer
  • Explain why the Mayflower Compact was significant in history. You should have a minimum of 2 sentences.
    10·1 answer
  • What s the coldest planet?​
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!