Some historians described the davis administration (january 1870-january 1874) as

1 answer:

5 0

Some historians described the Davis administration (January 1870- January 1874) as one of the most corrupt in Texas history. Edmund Jackson Davis elects as the first Republican Governor of Texas. During this administration violence and lawlessness was the serious problem so that Governor Davis declared martial law in some places.

You might be interested in

When and how is it beneficial for the United States to intervene in

Vanyuwa [196]

The United States and all other countries should intervene in international conflicts when there are uprising and threats to world peace. The questions “why, when and how” should be done to decide when an intervention is necessary.

The consequences of the last US intervention created resentment, the threat of terror resulted in costly interventions, causing the spent of billion of dollars internally and externally defending and protecting other nations.

There was an increase of wiretapping, surveillance of civilians, intrusive body searches at security points., this turned the US into a national security state.

5 0

3 years ago

Who translated the hebrew bible and the greek books of the new testament into latin?

Papessa [141]

I'm pretty sure it was St Jerome

7 0

3 years ago

Which President, John Kennedy or Lyndon Johnson, was the better president in your opinion and why?

Karo-lina-s [1.5K]

Answer:

For me John Kennedy because a lot of people love him back then so I’m guessing that he did something amazing That makes people love him,, that’s our topic in social study so yeah

Explanation:

4 0

3 years ago

Why was the battle of Saratoga a turning point in the war?

fomenos

I'm thinking A because Saratoga is in the south. Hope this helps.

3 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Can some one do the American revaluation time line please, just short brief answers

Mazyrski [523]

Explanation:

[1] Bryan Caplan, “Independence Day: Any Reason to Celebrate?” EconLog (July 4, 2007).

[2] Robert M. Calhoun, “Loyalism and Neutrality,” in The Blackwell Encyclopedia of the American Revolution, ed. By Jack P. Greene and J. R. Pole (Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell, 1991), p. 247.

[3] Royal placemen were British officials and other members of the elite to whom the Crown gave special privileges.

[4] Gordon S. Wood, The Radicalism of the American Revolution (New York: A. A. Knopf, 1992), p. 6.

[5] Robert J. Steinfeld, The Invention of Free Labor: The Employment Relation in English and American Law and Culture, 1350-1870 (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1991); Steinfeld, Coercion, Contract, and Free Labor in the Nineteenth Century (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).

[6] Wood, Radicalism of American Revolution, pp. 6-8.

[7] As quoted in Bernhard Knollenberg, Origin of the American Revolution, 1759-1766 (New York: Macmillan, 1960), p. 92. The memo is part of the papers of Lord Shelburne, president of the Board of Trade, and was probably written by his secretary, Maurice Morgann.

[8] John S. Milloy, A National Crime: The Canadian Government and the Residential School System, 1879 to 1986 (Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press, 1999). p. 42.

[9] John Dickinson, The Writings of John Dickinson (Bedford, MA: Applewood Books, 1895), pp. 457-58. Dickinson wrote this passage in a pamphlet written under the name Rusticus.

[10] Justin du Rivage, Revolution Against Empire: Taxes, Politics, and the Origins of American Independence (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2017), p. 103.

[11] Robert E. Lucas, Jr., “Colonialism and Growth” Historically Speaking, 4 (April 2003): 29-31; Niall Ferguson, “British Imperialism Revisited: The Costs and Benefits of ‘Anglobalization’” ibid.: 21-27.

[12] R. R. Palmer, The Age of Democratic Revolution, 2 v. (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1959-1964).

[13] As quoted in Selwyn H. H. Carrington, “The American Revolution and the Sugar Colonies, 1775-1783,” in The Blackwell Encyclopedia of the American Revolution, p. 516.

[14] Gordon Tullock, “The Paradox of Revolution”, Public Choice, no. 9 (Fall 1971): 95.

3 0

3 years ago